⚖️ RKLAW
Log in

Decisions 137 found

All Domsdatabasen · 610 Højesteret · 144 HUDOC (EMD) · 565 EUR-Lex (CJEU) · 478
Reset
Results load automatically as you scroll
EMD EMD – Committee 2026-10-22 57074/17, 79970/17, 44104/18, 47224/18, 50499/18, 51946/18, 52048/18, 52101/18, 53015/18, 53374/18 Judgment

CASE OF IVANOVA AND OTHERS v. RUSSIA

Russia
Violation of Article 1 of Protocol No. 1 - Protection of property (Article 1 para. 1 of Protocol No. 1 - Peaceful enjoyment of possessions); Violation of Article 6 - Right to a fair trial (Article 6 - Civil proceedings; Article 6-1 - Tribunal established by law)
EMD EMD – Chamber 2026-10-08 72982/17, 74407/17 Judgment

CASE OF CHERKASOV AND KUZIN v. UKRAINE

Ukraine
Violation of Article 1 of Protocol No. 1 - Protection of property (Article 1 para. 2 of Protocol No. 1 - Control of the use of property); No violation of Article 14+P1-1-1 - Prohibition of discrimination (Article 14 - Discrimination) (Article 1 of Protocol No. 1 - Protection of property; Article 1 para. 1 of Protocol No. 1 - Peaceful enjoyment of possessions); Non-pecuniary damage - award (Article 41 - Non-pecuniary …
EMD EMD – Committee 2026-10-08 16670/25, 16733/25, 16735/25 Judgment

CASE OF AVERSANO AND OTHERS v. ITALY

Italy
Violation of Article 6 - Right to a fair trial (Article 6 - Enforcement proceedings; Article 6-1 - Access to court); Violation of Article 6 - Right to a fair trial (Article 6 - Enforcement proceedings; Article 6-1 - Access to court); Violation of Article 1 of Protocol No. 1 - Protection of property (Article 1 para. 1 of Protocol No. 1 - Peaceful enjoyment of possessions)
EMD EMD – Chamber 2026-10-06 12043/19, 50484/20 Judgment

CASE OF ANAR MAMMADOV v. AZERBAIJAN

Azerbaijan
Violation of Article 8 - Right to respect for private and family life (Article 8-1 - Respect for correspondence; Respect for home; Respect for private life); Violation of Article 10 - Freedom of expression - {general} (Article 10-1 - Freedom of expression); Violation of Article 1 of Protocol No. 1 - Protection of property (Article 1 para. 1 of Protocol No. 1 - Peaceful enjoyment of possessions; Article 1 para. 2 of P…
EMD EMD 2026-09-29 35735/24 Communicated case

ZANDBERGEN v. THE NETHERLANDS

Netherlands
The application concerns the Amsterdam municipal anti-harassment plan (“Treiteraanpak”), a multi-agency programme introduced in 2013 to address serious and persistent harassment in residential communities. Once a person was subjected to the Treiteraanpak, the municipality built a profile on that person, accessible to municipal services, police, housing associations and care agencies, and could adopt administrative me…
EMD EMD 2026-09-29 7972/23 Communicated case

FERRARESI v. ITALY

Italy
L’affaire concerne l’effet combiné d’une mesure de confiscation du profit d’un délit ordonnée par les juridictions pénales et d’une condamnation, prononcée ultérieurement par la Cour des comptes, à indemniser l’administration des dommages causés par le même délit.
EMD EMD 2026-09-28 20695/24 Communicated case

M. v. THE UNITED KINGDOM

United Kingdom
The applicant was sexually assaulted by a teacher, X, at her boarding school in 1990 when she was eight years old. The offence was reported to the police at the time but the applicant was not believed. She reported it again to the police as an adult in 2012 but the police declined to reopen the investigation even though, unknown to the applicant, X had been convicted in 2007 of the sexual assault of a child in very s…
HR Højesteret 2026-09-18 869/2026 Dom/kendelse

Erhververen af en ejendom havde ikke ekstingveret naboens utinglyste hævd, da en landinspektørs udtalelser om manglende hævd ikke var sket på erhververens vegne

A ApS mod B og C
AI **Dom i Højesteret (869/2026)** **Fakta:** A Holding ApS ønskede at sammenlægge to matrikler på en ejendom i X. Landinspektør D blev rekvireret til at forestå sammenlægningen. I juni 2017 havde landinspektør D en korrespondance med naboejeren B, hvor han oplyste, at B ikke havde vundet hævd over en indkørsel, der lå mellem de to ejendomme. I december 2017 bekræftede landinspektør D, at B havde modtaget målebladet, …
EMD EMD 2026-09-17 2202/23, 20564/24, 20805/24, 21832/24, 23267/24, 26087/24, 28679/24, 29054/24, 30591/24, 31597/24, 32328/24, 35038/24, 36806/24, 37187/24, 37588/24 Communicated case

ROMENSKYY v. RUSSIA and 14 other applications

Russia
Following a preliminary examination of the admissibility of the applications on 17 September 2026, the Court decided, under Rule 54 § 2 (b) of the Rules of Court, that notice of the applications should be given to the Government of Russia. It is to be noted that the issue of jurisdiction over the area where the incidents giving rise to the complaints allegedly took place has been examined and decided by the Grand Cha…
EMD EMD 2026-09-17 20793/24, 22563/24, 27789/24, 30141/24, 30208/24, 30882/24, 31001/24, 33138/24, 33146/24, 33308/24, 33309/24, 33329/24, 33330/24, 33914/24, 33920/24, 33924/24, 33983/24, 34914/24, 34922/24, 34927/24, 34951/24, 34987/24, 34995/24, 34999/24, 35140/24, 35152/24, 35404/24, 37548/24 Communicated case

MYKHAYLOVA AND CHORNOMORCHENKO v. RUSSIA and 27 other applications

Russia
Following a preliminary examination of the admissibility of the applications on 17 September 2026, the Court decided, under Rule 54 § 2 (b) of the Rules of Court, that notice of the applications should be given to the Government of Russia. It is to be noted that the issue of jurisdiction over the area where the incidents giving rise to the complaints allegedly took place has been examined and decided by the Grand Cha…
EMD EMD 2026-09-17 50807/22, 20357/24, 22585/24, 23228/24, 28726/24, 30449/24, 31112/24, 31498/24, 32446/24, 32715/24, 32852/24, 34362/24, 37077/24, 37570/24 Communicated case

KOVALCHUK v. RUSSIA and 13 other applications

Russia
Following a preliminary examination of the admissibility of the applications on 17 September 2026, the Court decided, under Rule 54 § 2 (b) of the Rules of Court, that notice of the applications should be given to the Government of Russia. It is to be noted that the issue of jurisdiction over the area where the incidents giving rise to the complaints allegedly took place has been examined and decided by the Grand Cha…
EMD EMD 2026-09-17 50975/22, 56133/22, 56201/22, 57702/22, 1550/23, 23565/24, 24371/24, 24541/24, 30923/24, 32369/24, 32581/24, 32655/24, 32885/24, 32922/24, 33068/24, 33339/24, 33736/24, 34154/24, 35671/24, 36993/24, 37135/24 Communicated case

PRYADCHENKO v. RUSSIA and 20 other applications

Russia
Following a preliminary examination of the admissibility of the applications on 17 September 2026, the Court decided, under Rule 54 § 2 (b) of the Rules of Court, that notice of the applications should be given to the Government of Russia. It is to be noted that the issue of jurisdiction over the area where the incidents giving rise to the complaints allegedly took place has been examined and decided by the Grand Cha…
EMD EMD 2026-09-15 16111/24 Communicated case

FINE DOO SKOPJE AND OTHERS v. NORTH MACEDONIA

North Macedonia
The application concerns the allegedly unlawful, politically motivated and disproportionate demolition of a building constructed by the first applicant (a company owned by the second and third applicants), following a finding by the domestic authorities that the building had been built in violation of the construction permit (for further details see FINE DOO and Others v. North Macedonia (dec.), no. 37948/13, §§ 4-18…
EMD EMD 2026-09-10 2652/22, 12977/23, 33015/23, 2665/25, 1034/26, 4644/26 Communicated case

THEODOROLEAS v. GREECE and 5 other applications

Greece
The applications concern the dismissal of the applicants’ claims for compensation against the Greek State for damage allegedly caused by errors of judicial bodies. These dismissals followed a departure by the Supreme Administrative Court (‘SAC’) from its previous case-law in judgment no. 800/2021, with the result that such claims were no longer eligible for judicial review for an indefinite period, pending the adopti…
EMD EMD 2026-09-09 18556/20 Communicated case

RYEZNIK v. UKRAINE

Ukraine
The case concerns the applicant’s obligation to pay for heat supply services which were never provided to him. In 2009 the applicant got his flat disconnected from the district heating network after the competent local authority had approved his application to that effect. On 11 August 2009 the applicant and representatives of the aforementioned authority and the installation company signed a report confirming that t…
EMD EMD 2026-09-03 47346/22, 17898/24, 20359/24, 27218/24, 27883/24, 28187/24, 29867/24, 31098/24, 32161/24, 33090/24, 33258/24, 33613/24, 34050/24, 34116/24, 36433/24, 37227/24, 657/25 Communicated case

OCHERETNA AND DOTSENKO v. RUSSIA and 16 other applications

Russia
Following a preliminary examination of the admissibility of the applications on 3 September 2026, the Court decided, under Rule 54 § 2 (b) of the Rules of Court, that notice of the applications should be given to the Government of Russia. It is to be noted that the issue of jurisdiction over the area where the incidents giving rise to the complaints allegedly took place has been examined and decided by the Grand Cham…
EMD EMD 2026-09-03 40921/22, 47418/22, 20889/24, 25881/24, 26657/24, 27462/24, 27797/24, 28261/24, 29768/24, 29902/24, 31449/24, 31520/24, 31537/24, 31559/24, 31931/24, 31959/24, 32134/24, 32539/24, 32544/24, 33678/24, 36935/24, 37035/24, 37102/24, 37139/24, 37563/24, 37577/24, 37717/24, 2574/25 Communicated case

KLYMOV v. RUSSIA and 27 other applications

Russia
Following a preliminary examination of the admissibility of the applications on 3 September 2026, the Court decided, under Rule 54 § 2 (b) of the Rules of Court, that notice of the applications should be given to the Government of Russia. It is to be noted that the issue of jurisdiction over the area where the incidents giving rise to the complaints allegedly took place has been examined and decided by the Grand Cham…
EMD EMD 2026-09-03 25564/24, 27695/24, 28821/24, 31328/24, 33340/24, 35005/24, 35164/24, 1481/25 Communicated case

MAKHSMA v. RUSSIA and 7 other applications

Russia
Following a preliminary examination of the admissibility of the applications on 3 September 2026, the Court decided, under Rule 54 § 2 (b) of the Rules of Court, that notice of the applications should be given to the Government of Russia. It is to be noted that the issue of jurisdiction over the area where the incidents giving rise to the complaints allegedly took place has been examined and decided by the Grand Cham…
EMD EMD 2026-09-01 39891/17, 45557/19, 22612/20 Communicated case

KHOMENOK v. RUSSIA and 2 other application

Russia
The applications arise from the conflict between Ukraine and the Russian Federation, following the latter’s assertion of jurisdiction over Crimea as of 27 February 2014 (see Ukraine v. Russia (re Crimea) (dec.) [GC], nos. 20958/14 and 38334/18, § 335, 16 December 2020). They primarily concern restrictions imposed on the applicants, who are journalists, from entering Crimea for periods of five or ten years on national…
EMD EMD 2026-09-01 4484/15, 30263/16, 55909/19, 36498/20, 11787/21 Communicated case

CHUBAROV v. RUSSIA qnd 4 other qpplicqtions

Russia
The applications arise from the conflict between Ukraine and the Russian Federation, following the latter’s assertion of jurisdiction over Crimea as of 27 February 2014 (see Ukraine v. Russia (re Crimea) (dec.) [GC], nos. 20958/14 and 38334/18, § 335, 16 December 2020). They primarily concern entry bans imposed on the applicants by the Russian authorities in relation to Crimea. The applicants, most of whom are of Cri…
EMD EMD 2026-08-27 37793/25 Communicated case

GUMUS v. SERBIA

Serbia
The application concerns the confiscation of undeclared cash belonging to the applicant at a border crossing. On 19 August 2019, while entering Serbia on his way to Türkiye, the applicant, a Turkish national, was stopped by Serbian customs officers who discovered that he was carrying 282,550 euros in cash, which he failed to declare, “in breach of the relevant legal obligation to declare all sums exceeding 10,000 eur…
EMD EMD – Committee 2026-08-27 31399/23 Judgment

CASE OF PRONTO INTERVENTI SIDA DI BUTERA FRANCESCO v. ITALY

Italy
Violation of Article 6 - Right to a fair trial (Article 6 - Enforcement proceedings; Article 6-1 - Access to court); Violation of Article 1 of Protocol No. 1 - Protection of property (Article 1 para. 1 of Protocol No. 1 - Peaceful enjoyment of possessions); Violation of Article 6 - Right to a fair trial (Article 6 - Enforcement proceedings; Article 6-1 - Access to court)
EMD EMD 2026-08-24 33164/20 Communicated case

RYMSHA v. UKRAINE

Ukraine
The applicant bought a flat from a private party. Domestic courts later found that the flat had been alienated from a previous owner through a fictitious transaction and ordered its return to the previous owner’s alleged heir. The applicant considers that the courts’ findings and the order requiring the return of the flat breached his rights under Article 6 of the Convention and Article 1 of Protocol No. 1.
DDB Københavns Byret 2026-08-21 BS-63249/2024-KBH Dom

Sag om ophævelse af et boliglejemål

Sag om korttidsudlejning af lejligheder i København (”skyggehoteller”) Dom afsagt: 21. august 2026 Sagen handlede om, hvorvidt en udlejer var berettiget til at foretage ophævelse af i alt syv boliglejemål i København, som var lejet af et selskab mhp. videreudlejning til beboelse, med den begrundelse, at lejeren anvendte det lejede til ulovlig korttidsudlejning og i strid med lejeaftalerne. Sagen kort fortalt Sagsøg…
EMD EMD 2026-08-20 12930/21, 42966/22, 24057/23, 37406/23, 38227/23 Communicated case

OCHERETYANYY v. UKRAINE and 4 other applications

Ukraine
The applications concern the applicants’ deprivation of property in favour of the State. In applications nos. 12930/21, 42966/22, 37406/23 and 38227/23 the applicants purchased from private persons commercial premises which had initially belonged to municipal property of the city of Dnipro and which had subsequently been sold at public auctions following the bankruptcy and liquidation of the respective municipal ente…
EMD EMD 2026-08-20 25786/23, 181/25, 16335/25, 17348/25 Communicated case

YUZHNYY ELEKTROTEKHNICHNYY ZAVOD, TOV v. UKRAINE and 3 other applications

Ukraine
The applications concern the applicants’ deprivation of property bought at public auctions. The applicants bought some real property at public auctions conducted by the State Bailiffs’ Service or the Deposit Guarantee Fund in connection with the relevant proceedings against private persons or entities which were unable to pay off their creditors (see Appendix below). Those auctions were later invalidated for various …
DDB Højesteret 2026-08-11 BS-47576/2025-HJR Dom

Højesteret stadfæster landsrettens dom i sag om mangler i forbindelse med erhvervelse af fast ejendom

AI Denne dom handler om en sag mellem en ejendomskøber (Appellant) og en ejendomsmægler (Appelindstævnte Ejendomsmæglerfirma) samt ejendommens sælgere (Appelindstævnte 1 og Appelindstævnte 2). Appellant havde købt en ejendom, men opdagede senere, at der var mangler i ejendommen, som ejendomsmægleren ikke havde oplyst. Appellant anlagde derfor sag mod ejendomsmægleren og sælgere for at få betaling for de mangler. Højest…
DDB Højesteret 2026-07-27 BS-14217/2026-HJR Dom

Prøvelse af administrativ afgørelse om at indkalde boliglejere til nyt stiftende afdelingsmøde blev ikke tillagt opsættende virkning

Frederiksberg Kommune
AI Dette er en dom fra Højesteret, der afgør en sag om, om en kommunal bestyrelse skal efterleve et påbud fra kommunen, mens sagen er ved retten. Kommunen havde pålagt Kærende, Boligforening at indkalde alle boliglejere til et nyt stiftende afdelingsmøde, hvor de skulle vælge en ny bestyrelse og ændre vedtægterne, så alle beboere havde lige beboerdemokratiske rettigheder. KAB som mandatar for Kærende, Boligforening ind…
EMD EMD 2026-07-17 54048/20 Communicated case

KYRYCHENKO v. UKRAINE

Ukraine
The case concerns the applicant’s complaints under Article 1 of Protocol No. 1 and Article 13 of the Convention regarding the allegedly arbitrary retention of his property by the investigating authorities, as well as the alleged damage and eventual loss of some of that property.
EMD EMD – Chamber 2026-07-16 20092/18, 30408/18, 42807/18, 45907/18, 27314/19, 28518/19, 28521/19, 28525/19, 28528/19, 28530/19, 28532/19, 28535/19 Judgment

CASE OF BAZHENOV AND OTHERS v. RUSSIA AND UKRAINE

Russia, Ukraine
Preliminary objection partially joined to merits and dismissed (Art. 35) Admissibility criteria; (Art 35-1) Four-month period (former six-month); Struck out of the list (Art. 37) Striking out applications-{general}; (Art. 37-1) Striking out applications; (Art. 37-1-a) Absence of intention to pursue application; Remainder inadmissible (Art. 35) Admissibility criteria; (Art. 35-3-a) Ratione materiae; (Art. 35-3-a) Rati…
EMD EMD 2026-07-16 20092/18, 30408/18, 42807/18, 45907/18, 27314/19, 28518/19, 28521/19, 28525/19, 28528/19, 28530/19, 28532/19, 28535/19 Legal summary

Bazhenov and Others v. Russia and Ukraine

Russia, Ukraine
Preliminary objection partially joined to merits and dismissed (Art. 35) Admissibility criteria; (Art 35-1) Four-month period (former six-month); Struck out of the list (Art. 37) Striking out applications-{general}; (Art. 37-1) Striking out applications; (Art. 37-1-a) Absence of intention to pursue application; Remainder inadmissible (Art. 35) Admissibility criteria; (Art. 35-3-a) Ratione materiae; (Art. 35-3-a) Rati…
EMD EMD – Chamber 2026-07-16 37249/24 Judgment

CASE OF BANCA SISTEMA S.P.A. v. ITALY

Italy
Violation of Article 6 - Right to a fair trial (Article 6 - Enforcement proceedings; Article 6-1 - Access to court); Violation of Article 1 of Protocol No. 1 - Protection of property (Article 1 para. 1 of Protocol No. 1 - Peaceful enjoyment of possessions); Non-pecuniary damage - finding of violation sufficient (Article 41 - Non-pecuniary damage; Just satisfaction)
EMD EMD – Chamber 2026-07-16 74061/17 Judgment

CASE OF ILEANA ROȘU v. ROMANIA

Romania
Remainder inadmissible (Art. 35) Admissibility criteria; (Art 35-1) Four-month period (former six-month); (Art. 35-3-a) Manifestly ill-founded; No violation of Article 1 of Protocol No. 1 - Protection of property (Article 1 para. 1 of Protocol No. 1 - Peaceful enjoyment of possessions; Article 1 para. 2 of Protocol No. 1 - Control of the use of property)
EMD EMD 2026-07-09 7123/23 Communicated case

M.Z. AND D.Z. v. RUSSIA AND UKRAINE

Russia
The application arises from the full-scale invasion of Ukraine by the Russian Federation that began on 24 February 2022. It concerns the rape and other forms of violence allegedly inflicted upon the first applicant and the alleged unlawful killing of her husband by Russian forces in their home in the Kyiv region on 9 March 2022 (see, for the context, Ukraine and the Netherlands v. Russia [GC], nos. 8019/16 and 3 othe…
EMD EMD 2026-07-07 5362/23 Communicated case

KOSTOVSKI v. NORTH MACEDONIA

North Macedonia
The application concerns the freezing of the applicants’ assets (apartments, plots of land, stocks and vehicles) by three separate orders (“the freezing orders”) issued on 18 November 2020, 30 December 2020 and 15 January 2021 by the Skopje Criminal Court of First Instance at the preliminary investigation stage of criminal proceedings against the applicants. The proceedings concerned suspicions of abuse of office and…