⚖️ RKLAW
Log in

Decisions 171 found

All Domsdatabasen · 610 Højesteret · 144 HUDOC (EMD) · 565 EUR-Lex (CJEU) · 478
Reset
Results load automatically as you scroll
EU EU-Retten 2026-10-14 T-205/25 Judgment (General Court)

Giulio Cesare Rizza mod Europa-Kommissionen (T-205/25)

Giulio Cesare Rizza mod Europa-Kommissionen
AI This is a court decision from the General Court of the European Union, dated October 14, 2026. The decision concerns a case brought by Mr. Giulio Cesare Rizza against the European Commission, seeking access to documents related to the Commission's competition law enforcement activities. The court's decision is as follows: 1. The action is dismissed in its entirety. 2. The applicant, Mr. Rizza, is ordered to bear hi…
EMD EMD – Chamber 2026-10-13 25406/22 Judgment

CASE OF CENGIZ v. TÜRKİYE

Türkiye
Violation of Article 8 - Right to respect for private and family life (Article 8-1 - Respect for correspondence; Respect for family life; Respect for private life); Pecuniary damage - claim dismissed (Article 41 - Pecuniary damage; Just satisfaction); Non-pecuniary damage - award (Article 41 - Non-pecuniary damage; Just satisfaction)
EU EU-Domstolen 2026-10-08 C-571/24 Judgment (Court of Justice)

YO og CT mod Bundesrepublik Deutschland (C-571/24)

YO og CT mod Bundesrepublik Deutschland
AI Domstolen (Fjerde Afdeling) har besluttet: Artikel 10, stk. 3, litra a), i Rådets direktiv 2003/86/EF af 22. september 2003 om ret til familiesammenføring skal fortolkes således, at når en tredjelandsstatsborger, der er indrejst som »uledsaget mindreårig« på en medlemsstats område, har nået myndighedsalderen under proceduren for behandling af den pågældendes ansøgning om international beskyttelse og er blevet tilken…
EMD EMD – Chamber 2026-10-08 27379/24 Judgment

CASE OF L.Z. AND D.Z. v. ITALY

Italy
Violation of Article 8 - Right to respect for private and family life (Article 8 - Positive obligations; Article 8-1 - Respect for family life); Respondent State to take individual measures (Article 46-2 - Individual measures); Respondent State to take measures of a general character (Article 46-2 - General measures); Pecuniary damage - claim dismissed (Article 41 - Pecuniary damage; Just satisfaction); Non-pecuniary…
EMD EMD 2026-10-08 27379/24 Legal summary

L.Z. and D.Z. v. Italy

Italy
Violation of Article 8 - Right to respect for private and family life (Article 8 - Positive obligations; Article 8-1 - Respect for family life); Respondent State to take individual measures (Article 46-2 - Individual measures); Respondent State to take measures of a general character (Article 46-2 - General measures); Pecuniary damage - claim dismissed (Article 41 - Pecuniary damage; Just satisfaction); Non-pecuniary…
EU EU-Retten 2026-10-07 T-203/24 Judgment (General Court)

Zalando SE mod Europa-Kommissionen (T-203/24)

Zalando SE mod Europa-Kommissionen
⚠ Dommen er endnu ikke tilgængelig på dansk eller engelsk. Tilgængelige sprog: tysk, fransk.
AI La décision du Tribunal de l'Union européenne est favorable à la Commission européenne et rejette le recours de Zalando SE. La Commission a appliqué à bon droit les exceptions relatives à la protection des intérêts commerciaux et des procédures juridictionnelles prévues par le règlement n° 1049/2001. Le Tribunal a également considéré que la Commission n'était pas tenue de consulter les fournisseurs de données tiers e…
EMD EMD – Chamber 2026-10-06 12043/19, 50484/20 Judgment

CASE OF ANAR MAMMADOV v. AZERBAIJAN

Azerbaijan
Violation of Article 8 - Right to respect for private and family life (Article 8-1 - Respect for correspondence; Respect for home; Respect for private life); Violation of Article 10 - Freedom of expression - {general} (Article 10-1 - Freedom of expression); Violation of Article 1 of Protocol No. 1 - Protection of property (Article 1 para. 1 of Protocol No. 1 - Peaceful enjoyment of possessions; Article 1 para. 2 of P…
EMD EMD – Chamber 2026-10-06 42160/21 Judgment

CASE OF PAVLOVIĆ v. SERBIA

Serbia
Preliminary objection joined to merits and dismissed (Art. 34) Individual applications; (Art. 34) Victim; Remainder inadmissible (Art. 35) Admissibility criteria; (Art. 35-3-a) Manifestly ill-founded; Violation of Article 8 - Right to respect for private and family life (Article 8 - Positive obligations; Article 8-1 - Respect for private life); Non-pecuniary damage - award (Article 41 - Non-pecuniary damage; Just sat…
DDB Højesteret 2026-10-06 BS-44501/2025-HJR Dom

Landsrettens dom ændres således, at appelindstævnte til appellant 1 skal betale godtgørelse med 30.000 kr. og således at appellant 2 ikke skal betale sagsomkostninger for landsretten til appelindstævnte i sag om appelindstævntes videregivelse af oplysninger i forbindelse med aktindsigt

Kommunernes Landsforening
AI Denne dom handler om en sag omkring databeskyttelse og krænkelser af privatlivet. To kvinder, Appellant 1 og Appellant 2, havde anmeldt en sag mod Kommune (Appelindstævnte) for at have krænket deres privatliv ved at videregive oplysninger om deres helbred og økonomi uden deres samtykke. Højesteret har vurderet, at videregivelsen af oplysningerne om Appellant 1's helbred og Appellant 2's økonomi har krænket deres ret…
EMD EMD 2026-10-02 4525/21, 49851/21 Communicated case

PAPADOPOULOS v. GREECE and 1 other application

Greece
The applications concern under Article 8 of the Convention the transmission of the applicant’s personal data by a bank, from which he had taken loans, to a debtor notification company. Following the applicant’s appeals, the Court of Cassation by its decisions nos. 3/2020 of its Plenary and 435/2021 of Section A1, held that the general term included in the applicant’s loan agreements that his personal data would be pr…
EMD EMD 2026-10-02 1352/21 Communicated case

TZIVA v. GREECE

Greece
The application concerns disciplinary proceedings brought against the applicant, a public prosecutor. On 17 January 2017 the applicant had been instructed by the Prosecutor of the Court of Cassation to conduct a preliminary criminal investigation. On the same date, she was informed by P.Ch., an officer of the coast guard, and by the Minister of Justice that a detained person, E.G., wished to provide a statement in re…
EMD EMD 2026-09-29 35735/24 Communicated case

ZANDBERGEN v. THE NETHERLANDS

Netherlands
The application concerns the Amsterdam municipal anti-harassment plan (“Treiteraanpak”), a multi-agency programme introduced in 2013 to address serious and persistent harassment in residential communities. Once a person was subjected to the Treiteraanpak, the municipality built a profile on that person, accessible to municipal services, police, housing associations and care agencies, and could adopt administrative me…
EMD EMD 2026-09-29 28680/24 Communicated case

KWIECIŃSKI AND MYCEK v. POLAND

Poland
The application concerns allegedly inadequate protection against the homophobic hate speech. The applicants, a same-sex couple residing in Poland, were married in Portugal in 2017. On 24 May 2017 the applicants shared on Facebook a photograph depicting them kissing. The post received several thousand comments many of them hateful, homophobic, inciting to violence and containing death threats. On 10 July 2017 the appl…
EMD EMD 2026-09-29 26558/26 Communicated case

CHRISTIANSEN v. DENMARK

Denmark
AI 1) Fakta: Sagen omhandler en kvinde, Carina Baunhøj Christiansen, som blev dømt for at have skrevet truende kommentarer på Facebook i 2016. Hun blev idømt 7 dages fængsel, men dette blev suspenderet. Efter at have anket flere gange, blev hendes ønske om at få hendes DNA-profil slettet afvist af de danske myndigheder. 2) Retlig spørgsmål: Spørgsmålet er, om det fortsatte opbevaring af Christiansens DNA-profil i det d…
HR Højesteret 2026-09-29 91/2025 Dom/kendelse

Højesteret – sag 91/2025

Anklagemyndigheden mod A
A skulle frakendes dansk statsborgerskab som følge af svig A kom i 1999 som 20-årig til Danmark fra Libanon som statsløs palæstinenser. I september 2013 ansøgte hun om dansk indfødsret (statsborgerskab). I ansøgningsskemaet erklærede hun, at hun ikke havde begået kriminelle forhold. Den 22. april 2015 skrev Justitsministeriet til A, at ministeriet havde færdigbehandlet hendes ansøgning, og at ministeriet påtænkte …
HR Højesteret 2026-09-29 89/2025 Dom/kendelse

Højesteret – sag 89/2025

Anklagemyndigheden mod A
AI Højesteret har behandlet en sag om frakendelse af dansk indfødsret efter indfødsretsloven § 8 A. A var blevet sigtet for vold og havde forsøgt at fortie relevante oplysninger, hvilket landsretten havde vurderet som et svigagtigt forhold, der havde været bestemmende for erhvervelsen af dansk indfødsret. Højesteret har ikke tilsidesat landsrettens vurdering, men har i stedet vurderet, om frakendelsen af indfødsretten …
EMD EMD 2026-09-28 20695/24 Communicated case

M. v. THE UNITED KINGDOM

United Kingdom
The applicant was sexually assaulted by a teacher, X, at her boarding school in 1990 when she was eight years old. The offence was reported to the police at the time but the applicant was not believed. She reported it again to the police as an adult in 2012 but the police declined to reopen the investigation even though, unknown to the applicant, X had been convicted in 2007 of the sexual assault of a child in very s…
EMD EMD 2026-09-28 33721/25 Communicated case

DATASHVILI v. GEORGIA

Georgia
The application primarily concerns the arrest and subsequent pre-trial detention of the applicant, a civil education teacher and civil society activist, on charges of attacking a court bailiff in the course of his duties (an offence under Article 352(2) § 3 of the Criminal Code). The applicant also complained that the psychiatric medical examination imposed on her had been unlawful.
EMD EMD 2026-09-23 20858/22, 25980/22, 27968/22, 41145/22, 41313/22, 41317/22, 42838/22, 48449/22 Communicated case

KORUNNYY AND OTHERS v. RUSSIA and 7 other applications

Russia
The applications arise from the full-scale invasion of Ukraine by the Russian Federation, which began on 24 February 2022. They concern the alleged injuries, ill-treatment, forced labour and unlawful detention of a number of Ukrainian prisoners of war – some of the applicants and the remaining applicants’ close relatives – by agents of the Russian Federation.
EMD EMD 2026-09-21 36449/23 Communicated case

GRANOVSKYY v. UKRAINE

Ukraine
The applicant is a Ukrainian politician and businessman. In November 2019 an article “On smuggling with “a smuggler”: the first big interview with [Mr F.]” was published at the website of a privately owned news agency. A businessman, Mr F., alleged that the applicant had been involved in organising smuggling and in other corruption-related unlawful activities within the customs authorities. The negative statements co…
EMD EMD 2026-09-17 50807/22, 20357/24, 22585/24, 23228/24, 28726/24, 30449/24, 31112/24, 31498/24, 32446/24, 32715/24, 32852/24, 34362/24, 37077/24, 37570/24 Communicated case

KOVALCHUK v. RUSSIA and 13 other applications

Russia
Following a preliminary examination of the admissibility of the applications on 17 September 2026, the Court decided, under Rule 54 § 2 (b) of the Rules of Court, that notice of the applications should be given to the Government of Russia. It is to be noted that the issue of jurisdiction over the area where the incidents giving rise to the complaints allegedly took place has been examined and decided by the Grand Cha…
EMD EMD 2026-09-17 42434/23 Communicated case

ATANASOV v. BULGARIA

Bulgaria
L’affaire concerne la restriction alléguée du droit d’accès à un tribunal et l’atteinte alléguée du droit au respect de la vie privée du requérant. Le 17 juillet 2022, la voiture louée par le requérant fut contrôlée par une patrouille de police à l’entrée de Panagyurishte. Le véhicule fut fouillé. Ensuite, le requérant fut fouillé devant les autres passagers - son fils mineur, sa compagne et le conducteur du véhicule…
EMD EMD 2026-09-15 13022/24 Communicated case

IDE v. THE UNITED KINGDOM

United Kingdom
On 18 May 2005 the applicant was arrested on suspicion of assault occasioning grievous bodily harm and remanded in custody. He was subsequently convicted and on 16 February 2006 was sentenced to indeterminate imprisonment for the public protection (“IPP sentence”) with a minimum term of two years 91 days.
EMD EMD 2026-09-14 30039/20, 8445/21, 17963/21, 31382/21, 24522/22, 45548/22, 3482/25 Communicated case

ATAK v. TÜRKİYE and 6 other applications

Türkiye
The applications mainly concern the pre-trial detention of the applicants, who were all judges or prosecutors at the material time, on suspicion of membership of FETÖ/PDY (an organisation described by the Turkish authorities as “Fetullahist Terror Organisation / Parallel State Structure”), in the aftermath of the attempted coup d’état which took place on 15 July 2016.
EMD EMD 2026-09-11 20234/26 Communicated case

AJDER v. SERBIA

Serbia
The application concerns proceedings related to the applicant’s custody over, maintenance of and contact with his two minor children, following his separation from their mother. Those proceeding were brought in 2020 and were partly finished by 2024. The proceedings concerning the applicant’s contact with his children, however, are still pending. On 10 February 2026 the Constitutional Court dismissed the applicant’s c…
EMD EMD 2026-09-10 21757/26 Communicated case

G.C. v. GREECE

Greece
The application concerns the respondent State’s alleged failure to conduct an effective investigation into the applicant’s criminal complaint of being a victim of child pornography offences at the age of thirteen, which ultimately resulted in the prosecution of one alleged offender becoming time-barred.
EMD EMD 2026-09-09 41480/17, 51617/17, 4440/19, 8081/19, 9033/19, 14751/19, 19788/19, 20359/19, 23504/19, 27600/19, 40777/19, 47482/19, 49430/19, 50222/19, 41583/20, 46666/20, 47332/20 Communicated case

PAKHAR v. RUSSIA AND UKRAINE and 16 other applications

Russia
The applications emanate from the armed conflict with Russia in the east of Ukraine. Each of the applicants was convicted of crimes by Ukrainian courts on various dates predating the outbreak of the armed conflict. Applicant no. 2, Mr Oleksiy Varganov, applicant no. 8, Mr Ruslan Kuzmin, and applicant no. 9, Mr Sergiy Rybalko were sentenced to eleven, nine and fifteen years of imprisonment, respectively. All other app…
EMD EMD 2026-09-09 15506/22 Communicated case

GORBACHEVSKA AND GORBACHEVSKYY v. RUSSIA

Russia
The application concerns the alleged risk to life of, and ill‑treatment suffered by, a Ukrainian prisoner of war (the second applicant) who was reportedly captured and detained by the Russian armed forces during the full‑scale invasion in the Kyiv region in March 2022 (see also Ukraine and the Netherlands v. Russia [GC], nos. 8019/16 and 3 others, § 67, 9 July 2025).
EMD EMD 2026-09-08 59306/18, 12769/19, 12879/19, 20701/19 Communicated case

SHAVELA v. RUSSIA AND UKRAINE and 3 other applications

Russia
The applications emanate from the armed conflict with Russia in the east of Ukraine. Each of the applicants was convicted of crimes by Ukrainian courts and sentenced to life imprisonment. The applicants’ sentences became final on various dates preceding the establishment of the effective control over the east of Ukraine by the Russian Federation (see Ukraine and the Netherlands v. Russia (dec.) [GC], nos. 8019/16 and…
EU EU-Domstolen 2026-09-03 C-798/24 Judgment (Court of Justice)

A m.fl (C-798/24)

A m.fl
Præjudiciel forelæggelse – beskyttelse af fysiske personer i forbindelse med behandling af personoplysninger – forordning (EU) 2016/679 – artikel 5 – principper for behandling af personoplysninger – artikel 6 – lovlig behandling – selskabsret – direktiv (EU) 2017/1132 – artikel 14 – dokumenter og oplysninger, der skal offentliggøres – begrebet »personer, der deltager i ledelsen af, i tilsynet med eller i kontrollen m…
EMD EMD 2026-09-03 47346/22, 17898/24, 20359/24, 27218/24, 27883/24, 28187/24, 29867/24, 31098/24, 32161/24, 33090/24, 33258/24, 33613/24, 34050/24, 34116/24, 36433/24, 37227/24, 657/25 Communicated case

OCHERETNA AND DOTSENKO v. RUSSIA and 16 other applications

Russia
Following a preliminary examination of the admissibility of the applications on 3 September 2026, the Court decided, under Rule 54 § 2 (b) of the Rules of Court, that notice of the applications should be given to the Government of Russia. It is to be noted that the issue of jurisdiction over the area where the incidents giving rise to the complaints allegedly took place has been examined and decided by the Grand Cham…
EMD EMD 2026-09-03 40921/22, 47418/22, 20889/24, 25881/24, 26657/24, 27462/24, 27797/24, 28261/24, 29768/24, 29902/24, 31449/24, 31520/24, 31537/24, 31559/24, 31931/24, 31959/24, 32134/24, 32539/24, 32544/24, 33678/24, 36935/24, 37035/24, 37102/24, 37139/24, 37563/24, 37577/24, 37717/24, 2574/25 Communicated case

KLYMOV v. RUSSIA and 27 other applications

Russia
Following a preliminary examination of the admissibility of the applications on 3 September 2026, the Court decided, under Rule 54 § 2 (b) of the Rules of Court, that notice of the applications should be given to the Government of Russia. It is to be noted that the issue of jurisdiction over the area where the incidents giving rise to the complaints allegedly took place has been examined and decided by the Grand Cham…
EMD EMD 2026-09-03 25564/24, 27695/24, 28821/24, 31328/24, 33340/24, 35005/24, 35164/24, 1481/25 Communicated case

MAKHSMA v. RUSSIA and 7 other applications

Russia
Following a preliminary examination of the admissibility of the applications on 3 September 2026, the Court decided, under Rule 54 § 2 (b) of the Rules of Court, that notice of the applications should be given to the Government of Russia. It is to be noted that the issue of jurisdiction over the area where the incidents giving rise to the complaints allegedly took place has been examined and decided by the Grand Cham…
EMD EMD 2026-09-03 26840/26 Communicated case

MATOUSSI v. DENMARK

Denmark
AI 1) Fakta: Hafed Matoussi, en tunesiske national født i Danmark i 1991, havde en kriminalitet og blev i 2018 pålagt udvisning med en varig re-indsættelsesforbud. Efter flere forlængelser af udvisningsordren blev Matoussi pålagt at bo på Kærshovedgård return center om natten og mellem dagsregisteringen på centeret og politiet. Han indledte en civil sag mod Return Agency, men fik ikke ret i første instans eller på appel…
EMD EMD 2026-09-03 4489/26 Communicated case

C.S. v. MALTA

Malta
The application concerns the applicant’s separation from her son. The applicant (mother) is undergoing separation proceedings before the Family Court and originally had care and custody of the couple’s child, K. The Child Protection Directorate (AA) was monitoring the situation as of 2019 as K was reluctant to see his father for supervised visits. However, on 18 July 2022 AA submitted that they should step aside from…
EMD EMD 2026-09-02 51856/20 Communicated case

VUYTSIV v. UKRAINE

Ukraine
The case concerns the placement, in 2017, of the applicant’s son (a life prisoner) in a prison located far from his family and repeated rejections of the applicant’s and her son’s requests for his transfer to a closer prison. Although the domestic courts cancelled one of such rejections and obliged the Ministry of Justice’s authorities to repeatedly examine the transfer request, that decision has apparently remained …
EMD EMD 2026-09-02 41145/15, 32554/17, 2111/18, 24490/18, 41466/22 Communicated case

KADYROV v. RUSSIA and 4 other applications

Russia
The applications arise from the conflict between Ukraine and the Russian Federation, following the latter’s assertion of jurisdiction over Crimea as of 27 February 2014 (see Ukraine v. Russia (re Crimea) (dec.) [GC], nos. 20958/14 and 38334/18, § 335, 16 December 2020). They primarily concern administrative expulsion orders and other restrictions imposed on the applicants by the Russian authorities in Crimea.
EMD EMD 2026-09-02 44766/22, 31966/25 Communicated case

PIETRUSZYŃSKI v. POLAND and 1 other application

Poland
The applicants are judges of the Criminal Chamber of the Supreme Court of Poland. The applications concern the criminal investigation into the applicants’ alleged wrongdoings within their judicial duties and the proceedings aimed at lifting their judicial immunity. The case raises issues under Articles 6, 8, 10 and 18 of the Convention.
EMD EMD 2026-09-01 4484/15, 30263/16, 55909/19, 36498/20, 11787/21 Communicated case

CHUBAROV v. RUSSIA qnd 4 other qpplicqtions

Russia
The applications arise from the conflict between Ukraine and the Russian Federation, following the latter’s assertion of jurisdiction over Crimea as of 27 February 2014 (see Ukraine v. Russia (re Crimea) (dec.) [GC], nos. 20958/14 and 38334/18, § 335, 16 December 2020). They primarily concern entry bans imposed on the applicants by the Russian authorities in relation to Crimea. The applicants, most of whom are of Cri…
EMD EMD 2026-09-01 11892/25, 12032/25 Communicated case

IOANNOU v. CYPRUS and 1 other application

Cyprus
The applicants are police officers against whom criminal and disciplinary proceedings were initiated in 2009 for, inter alia, corruption. In the meantime, the applicants were suspended from office, placed in detention for five days, and received reduced salaries. According to the applicants, the decision to institute criminal proceedings against the applicants was taken by the Deputy Attorney General at the time, not…
EMD EMD – Chamber 2026-09-01 25336/22 Judgment

CASE OF MANKUS v. LITHUANIA

Lithuania
Struck out of the list (Art. 37) Striking out applications-{general}; (Art. 37-1) Striking out applications; (Art. 37-1) Respect for human rights; (Art. 37-1-a) Absence of intention to pursue application; Violation of Article 8 - Right to respect for private and family life (Article 8-1 - Respect for private life); Pecuniary and non-pecuniary damage - award (Article 41 - Non-pecuniary damage; Pecuniary damage; Just s…