⚖️ RKLAW
Log in

Decisions 709 found

All Domsdatabasen · 610 Højesteret · 144 HUDOC (EMD) · 565 EUR-Lex (CJEU) · 478
Reset
Results load automatically as you scroll
EMD EMD – Chamber 2026-09-03 9327/23 Judgment

CASE OF A.S. v. LATVIA

Latvia
Preliminary objection joined to merits and dismissed (Article 35-3-a - Ratione materiae); No violation of Article 4 - Prohibition of slavery and forced labour (Article 4 - Positive obligations; Effective investigation; Article 4-1 - Servitude; Article 4-2 - Forced labour)
EMD EMD – Chamber 2026-09-03 23169/16, 23834/18, 37683/19, 17937/20 Judgment

CASE OF ASCIUTTO AND OTHERS v. ITALY

Italy
Preliminary objection joined to merits and dismissed (Art. 34) Individual applications; (Art. 34) Victim; Violation of Article 3 - Prohibition of torture (Article 3 - Degrading punishment; Inhuman punishment) (Substantive aspect); No violation of Article 3 - Prohibition of torture (Article 3 - Degrading punishment; Inhuman punishment) (Substantive aspect); Violation of Article 3 - Prohibition of torture (Article 3 - …
EMD EMD – Committee 2026-09-03 20068/21 Judgment

CASE OF BELOUS v. UKRAINE

Ukraine
Violation of Article 3 - Prohibition of torture (Article 3 - Degrading treatment) (Substantive aspect); Violation of Article 13+13 - Right to an effective remedy (Article 13 - Effective remedy) (Article 13 - Right to an effective remedy; Effective remedy); Violation of Article 34 - Individual applications (Article 34 - Hinder the exercise of the right of application)
EMD EMD – Committee 2026-09-03 42909/23 Judgment

CASE OF B.C. v. ITALY

Italy
Violation of Article 5 - Right to liberty and security (Article 5-1 - Lawful arrest or detention; Article 5-1-f - Expulsion; Prevent unauthorised entry into country); Violation of Article 5 - Right to liberty and security (Article 5-2 - Information on reasons for arrest); Violation of Article 5 - Right to liberty and security (Article 5-4 - Speediness of review)
EMD EMD 2026-09-02 51856/20 Communicated case

VUYTSIV v. UKRAINE

Ukraine
The case concerns the placement, in 2017, of the applicant’s son (a life prisoner) in a prison located far from his family and repeated rejections of the applicant’s and her son’s requests for his transfer to a closer prison. Although the domestic courts cancelled one of such rejections and obliged the Ministry of Justice’s authorities to repeatedly examine the transfer request, that decision has apparently remained …
EMD EMD 2026-09-02 1663/17, 1722/17 Communicated case

ANTONENKO v. RUSSIA and 1 other application

Russia
The applications concern alleged restrictions on the applicants’ right to freedom of movement between Crimea and mainland Ukraine, resulting from the Russian Federation’s de facto transformation of the administrative boundary line into a state border following its assertion of jurisdiction over Crimea (see Ukraine v. Russia (re Crimea) [GC], nos. 20958/14 and 38334/18, § 1175, 25 June 2024).
EMD EMD 2026-09-02 41145/15, 32554/17, 2111/18, 24490/18, 41466/22 Communicated case

KADYROV v. RUSSIA and 4 other applications

Russia
The applications arise from the conflict between Ukraine and the Russian Federation, following the latter’s assertion of jurisdiction over Crimea as of 27 February 2014 (see Ukraine v. Russia (re Crimea) (dec.) [GC], nos. 20958/14 and 38334/18, § 335, 16 December 2020). They primarily concern administrative expulsion orders and other restrictions imposed on the applicants by the Russian authorities in Crimea.
EMD EMD 2026-09-02 44766/22, 31966/25 Communicated case

PIETRUSZYŃSKI v. POLAND and 1 other application

Poland
The applicants are judges of the Criminal Chamber of the Supreme Court of Poland. The applications concern the criminal investigation into the applicants’ alleged wrongdoings within their judicial duties and the proceedings aimed at lifting their judicial immunity. The case raises issues under Articles 6, 8, 10 and 18 of the Convention.
EMD EMD 2026-09-01 39891/17, 45557/19, 22612/20 Communicated case

KHOMENOK v. RUSSIA and 2 other application

Russia
The applications arise from the conflict between Ukraine and the Russian Federation, following the latter’s assertion of jurisdiction over Crimea as of 27 February 2014 (see Ukraine v. Russia (re Crimea) (dec.) [GC], nos. 20958/14 and 38334/18, § 335, 16 December 2020). They primarily concern restrictions imposed on the applicants, who are journalists, from entering Crimea for periods of five or ten years on national…
EMD EMD 2026-09-01 4484/15, 30263/16, 55909/19, 36498/20, 11787/21 Communicated case

CHUBAROV v. RUSSIA qnd 4 other qpplicqtions

Russia
The applications arise from the conflict between Ukraine and the Russian Federation, following the latter’s assertion of jurisdiction over Crimea as of 27 February 2014 (see Ukraine v. Russia (re Crimea) (dec.) [GC], nos. 20958/14 and 38334/18, § 335, 16 December 2020). They primarily concern entry bans imposed on the applicants by the Russian authorities in relation to Crimea. The applicants, most of whom are of Cri…
EMD EMD 2026-09-01 14146/26 Communicated case

NICOLAOU v. CYPRUS

Cyprus
The applicant was a police officer. He was prosecuted for, inter alia, conspiracy to commit a felony and drug possession (criminal case no. 15956/08). The Assize Court dismissed the case on account of the prosecution’s failure to establish a prima facie case. It considered the evidence against him was insufficient and incapable of establishing the elements of the offenses with which he had been accused. Pending the c…
EMD EMD 2026-09-01 52683/22 Communicated case

JANEVA v. NORTH MACEDONIA

North Macedonia
The application concerns the alleged unfairness of criminal proceedings against the applicant, who is the former Special Public Prosecutor (for the background to the establishment of the Special Public Prosecutor’s Office, see Taleski v. North Macedonia (dec.), no. 77796/17 and five other applications, §§ 4-10, 24 January 2023).
EMD EMD 2026-09-01 11892/25, 12032/25 Communicated case

IOANNOU v. CYPRUS and 1 other application

Cyprus
The applicants are police officers against whom criminal and disciplinary proceedings were initiated in 2009 for, inter alia, corruption. In the meantime, the applicants were suspended from office, placed in detention for five days, and received reduced salaries. According to the applicants, the decision to institute criminal proceedings against the applicants was taken by the Deputy Attorney General at the time, not…
EMD EMD – Chamber 2026-09-01 51829/21 Judgment

CASE OF D.T. v. GREECE

Greece
Violation of Article 3 - Prohibition of torture (Article 3 - Degrading treatment; Inhuman treatment) (Substantive aspect); No violation of Article 13+3 - Right to an effective remedy (Article 13 - Effective remedy) (Article 3 - Prohibition of torture; Degrading treatment; Inhuman treatment); Non-pecuniary damage - award (Article 41 - Non-pecuniary damage; Just satisfaction)
EMD EMD – Chamber 2026-09-01 25336/22 Judgment

CASE OF MANKUS v. LITHUANIA

Lithuania
Struck out of the list (Art. 37) Striking out applications-{general}; (Art. 37-1) Striking out applications; (Art. 37-1) Respect for human rights; (Art. 37-1-a) Absence of intention to pursue application; Violation of Article 8 - Right to respect for private and family life (Article 8-1 - Respect for private life); Pecuniary and non-pecuniary damage - award (Article 41 - Non-pecuniary damage; Pecuniary damage; Just s…
EMD EMD 2026-08-31 60609/21 Communicated case

VARDANYAN v. ARMENIA

Armenia
The application concerns libel proceedings brought against the applicant – a lawyer specialised in environmental law – by a private company (“the company”) which developed the Amulsar gold mine project. As a member of a working group on responsible State mining policy (including the Amulsar mine project) the applicant participated in a meeting of the working group, during which she insinuated that the company had eng…
EMD EMD 2026-08-31 41089/20 Communicated case

GASPARYAN v. ARMENIA

Armenia
On 1 January 2017 the applicant started working in a water supply company (“the Company”) as a Deputy Head of a Technical Directorate. On 29 March 2017 the Company notified the applicant that his employment contract in that position would be terminated, while offering him the position of the head of another division. The applicant marked “I agree” on that notice.
EMD EMD 2026-08-31 8639/26 Communicated case

LALOO AND BRAEM v. BELGIUM

Belgium
La requête concerne la durée de la procédure pénale menée contre les requérants qui débuta le 9 septembre 2015 et se termina avec l’arrêt de la Cour de cassation du 28 octobre 2025. La partie de la procédure devant cette juridiction dura du 3 décembre 2020 au 28 octobre 2025, soit environ quatre ans et dix mois.
HR Højesteret 2026-08-28 31/2026 Dom/kendelse

Domfældelse af T på grundlag af bevismateriale tilvejebragt ved brug af kontrolkøber var ikke i strid med artikel 6 i Menneskerettighedskonventionen

Anklagemyndigheden mod T
AI Dommen fra Højesteret i sagen om tobakssurrogat-sagen finder, at T er blevet straffet på et bevisgrundlag, der er blevet tilvejebragt ved provokation. Det er blevet konstateret, at Sikkerhedsstyrelsen havde instrueret en 16-årig kontrolkøber om at købe tobakssurrogat i T's butik, selv om produktet ikke måtte sælges til personer under 18 år. Højesteret finder, at dette ikke kan anses for en passiv efterforskning, og a…
HR Højesteret 2026-08-27 13035/2026 Dom/kendelse

Det ville være i strid med retten til en retfærdig rettergang at afvise en medarbejders sag mod en international organisation

OSCE Parliamentary Assembly mod A
AI Højesteret har afgjort sagen om A's krav mod OSCE Parliamentary Assembly (OSCE PA) om godtgørelse for ophævelsen af hendes kontrakt uden varsel. Højesteret har konkluderet, at OSCE PA's immunitet ikke kan gøres gældende i denne sag, da det ville udgøre en krænkelse af A's ret til en retfærdig rettergang efter Den Europæiske Menneskerettighedskonventions artikel 6. Højesteret har fundet, at den interne tvisteløsnings…
EMD EMD 2026-08-27 9867/26 Communicated case

VUJANOVIĆ v. MONTENEGRO

Montenegro
The applicant, a former judge of the Supreme Court, sought damages from the State for length of administrative proceedings concerning her judicial office, and claimed 5,000 euros (EUR) in just satisfaction. Although the competent court found a violation, it awarded the applicant EUR 500. The Constitutional Court dismissed her constitutional complaint by a decision of 4 January 2026.
EMD EMD 2026-08-27 37793/25 Communicated case

GUMUS v. SERBIA

Serbia
The application concerns the confiscation of undeclared cash belonging to the applicant at a border crossing. On 19 August 2019, while entering Serbia on his way to Türkiye, the applicant, a Turkish national, was stopped by Serbian customs officers who discovered that he was carrying 282,550 euros in cash, which he failed to declare, “in breach of the relevant legal obligation to declare all sums exceeding 10,000 eur…
EMD EMD – Committee 2026-08-27 5195/17 Judgment

CASE OF GHUKASYAN v. ARMENIA

Armenia
Violation of Article 5 - Right to liberty and security (Article 5-1 - Lawful arrest or detention); Violation of Article 5 - Right to liberty and security (Article 5-4 - Speediness of review); Violation of Article 5 - Right to liberty and security (Article 5-3 - Length of pre-trial detention)
EMD EMD – Committee 2026-08-27 41386/17, 35666/18, 22888/19, 58121/19, 29347/20, 40677/20, 40815/20, 50588/20 Judgment

CASE OF MACİT AND OTHERS v. TÜRKİYE

Türkiye
Violation of Article 5 - Right to liberty and security (Article 5-3 - Length of pre-trial detention); Violation of Article 5 - Right to liberty and security (Article 5-4 - Procedural guarantees of review); Violation of Article 5 - Right to liberty and security (Article 5-4 - Speediness of review)
EMD EMD – Committee 2026-08-27 19489/25, 27348/25, 28828/25 Judgment

CASE OF SHYTIKOV AND OTHERS v. UKRAINE

Ukraine
Violation of Article 6 - Right to a fair trial (Article 6 - Civil proceedings; Article 6-1 - Reasonable time); Violation of Article 13+6-1 - Right to an effective remedy (Article 13 - Effective remedy) (Article 6 - Right to a fair trial; Civil proceedings; Article 6-1 - Reasonable time)
EMD EMD – Committee 2026-08-27 31399/23 Judgment

CASE OF PRONTO INTERVENTI SIDA DI BUTERA FRANCESCO v. ITALY

Italy
Violation of Article 6 - Right to a fair trial (Article 6 - Enforcement proceedings; Article 6-1 - Access to court); Violation of Article 1 of Protocol No. 1 - Protection of property (Article 1 para. 1 of Protocol No. 1 - Peaceful enjoyment of possessions); Violation of Article 6 - Right to a fair trial (Article 6 - Enforcement proceedings; Article 6-1 - Access to court)
EMD EMD – Committee 2026-08-27 19195/23, 21299/24 Judgment

CASE OF ANGYAL AND OTHERS v. SLOVAKIA

Slovakia
Violation of Article 6 - Right to a fair trial (Article 6 - Administrative proceedings; Article 6-1 - Reasonable time); Violation of Article 13+6-1 - Right to an effective remedy (Article 13 - Effective remedy) (Article 6 - Right to a fair trial; Administrative proceedings; Article 6-1 - Reasonable time)
EMD EMD 2026-08-26 22006/24 Communicated case

RORY v. ROMANIA

Romania
The application concerns the respondent State’ responsibility for the inhuman treatment allegedly suffered by the applicant while placed in State orphanages during the communist era and the effectiveness of the legal framework available to obtain acknowledgment and redress for the resulting physical and psychological suffering. In particular, it raises the question whether the applicant was denied such redress as a r…
EMD EMD 2026-08-26 3413/24, 3625/24, 3867/24 Communicated case

CIJNTJE v. THE NETHERLANDS and 2 other applications

Netherlands
The applications concern the right to legal representation by a lawyer of one’s own choosing in criminal proceedings. On 25 February 2020 the applicants were convicted by the Court of First Instance in Curaçao of accepting bribes in connection with a tender process conducted by their employer, a State-owned company. The criminal investigation had been initiated following a report filed by the Prime Minister of Curaça…
EMD EMD 2026-08-26 14586/26 Communicated case

G.S. AND FUNDAŢIA CENTRUL DE RESURSE JURIDICE v. ROMANIA

Romania
The application mainly concerns the allegations of deprivation of liberty in the publicly run Medical and Social Care Centre where the first applicant was placed. It also concerns alleged breach of her right to private life, as she does not have a legal guardian appointed by the authorities despite her severe mental and physical disability.
EMD EMD 2026-08-25 12106/20 Communicated case

SHEVCHENKO v. UKRAINE

Ukraine
The case concerns the applicant’s allegedly arbitrary and disproportionate eviction, on 10 January 2020, from a State-owned residential bloc of apartments, where she had been accommodated, together with her disabled son (born in 1997), since 1 January 2006. The applicant complains under Article 8 of the Convention that her eviction interfered with her right to respect for her home. She additionally relies on Article …
EMD EMD – Chamber 2026-08-25 30915/23 Judgment

CASE OF ALEKSIEVA AND OTHERS v. BULGARIA

Bulgaria
Preliminary objection joined to merits and dismissed (Art. 34) Individual applications; (Art. 34) Victim; Remainder inadmissible (Art. 35) Admissibility criteria; (Art. 35-1) Exhaustion of domestic remedies; (Art. 35-3-a) Manifestly ill-founded; (Art. 35-3-a) Ratione materiae; Violation of Article 8 - Right to respect for private and family life (Article 8-1 - Respect for home); Respondent State to take measures of a…
EMD EMD – Grand Chamber 2026-08-25 2170/24 Judgment

CASE OF KAVALA v. TÜRKİYE (No. 2)

Türkiye
Preliminary objection dismissed (Art. 35) Admissibility criteria; (Art. 35-1) Exhaustion of domestic remedies; Remainder inadmissible (Art. 35) Admissibility criteria; (Art. 35-1) Exhaustion of domestic remedies; Violation of Article 10 - Freedom of expression - {general} (Article 10-1 - Freedom of expression); Violation of Article 11 - Freedom of assembly and association (Article 11-1 - Freedom of peaceful assembly)…
EMD EMD 2026-08-25 2170/24 Legal summary

Kavala v. Türkiye (No. 2) [GC]

Türkiye
Preliminary objection dismissed (Art. 35) Admissibility criteria; (Art. 35-1) Exhaustion of domestic remedies; Remainder inadmissible (Art. 35) Admissibility criteria; (Art. 35-1) Exhaustion of domestic remedies; Violation of Article 10 - Freedom of expression - {general} (Article 10-1 - Freedom of expression); Violation of Article 11 - Freedom of assembly and association (Article 11-1 - Freedom of peaceful assembly)…
HR Højesteret 2026-08-24 44501/2025 Dom/kendelse

Godtgørelse som følge af uberettiget videregivelse af oplysninger i forbindelse med aktindsigt

A og B mod Hillerød Kommune Biintervenient til støtte for Hillerød Kommune: KL
AI Højesteret har i en dom fastslået, at Hillerød Kommune har krænket A's ret til privatliv efter Menneskerettighedskonventionens artikel 8 ved at videregive oplysninger om hendes helbred til en privatperson. Kommunen har også krænket B's ret til privatliv ved at videregive oplysninger om hans privatøkonomiske situation. Højesteret har bestemt, at Hillerød Kommune skal betale en godtgørelse på 30.000 kr. til A med proc…