EMD
EMD
2026-09-17
43875/22, 15494/24, 30568/24, 19381/25, 31251/25
Decision
GRUJIČIĆ AND OTHERS v. SERBIA
Serbia
Struck out of the list
Decisions 709 found
EMD
EMD
2026-09-17
8333/23
Decision
HORVÁTH v. SLOVAKIA
Slovakia
Inadmissible
EMD
EMD
2026-09-17
6460/22, 14745/22, 32709/22, 40344/22, 41564/22, 45020/22, 50226/22
Decision
ANDRIEŞ AND OTHERS v. ROMANIA
Romania
Struck out of the list
EMD
EMD
2026-09-17
34524/23
Decision
PJEVIĆ v. SERBIA
Serbia
Struck out of the list
EMD
EMD
2026-09-17
2923/26, 5840/26, 5841/26, 5908/26, 6592/26, 9386/26, 9491/26, 10750/26, 12326/26, 13265/26
Decision
ORSZÁG AND OTHERS v. HUNGARY
Hungary
Struck out of the list
EMD
EMD
2026-09-17
25861/25, 36371/25
Decision
BURZYŃSKI AND KOWALCZUK v. POLAND
Poland
Struck out of the list
EMD
EMD
2026-09-17
9652/25, 23675/25, 29058/25, 29742/25, 30932/25
Decision
ŚWIĘCICKA AND OTHERS v. POLAND
Poland
Struck out of the list
EMD
EMD
2026-09-17
20941/25, 22471/25, 22475/25, 33509/25
Decision
STEFANIAK AND OTHERS v. POLAND
Poland
Struck out of the list
EMD
EMD – Chamber
2026-09-17
54266/17
Judgment
CASE OF MARGARYAN v. ARMENIA
Armenia
Violation of Article 2 - Right to life (Article 2-1 - Effective investigation) (Procedural aspect); Violation of Article 13+2 - Right to an effective remedy (Article 13 - Effective remedy) (Article 2 - Right to life); Non-pecuniary damage - award (Article 41 - Non-pecuniary damage; Just satisfaction)
EMD
EMD
2026-09-17
14064/24, 9744/25, 22493/25, 37228/25
Decision
TOMCZAK AND OTHERS v. POLAND
Poland
Struck out of the list
EMD
EMD – Chamber
2026-09-17
6522/19
Judgment
CASE OF STRASHUNSKYY v. UKRAINE
Ukraine
Violation of Article 3 - Prohibition of torture (Article 3 - Effective investigation) (Procedural aspect); Violation of Article 3 - Prohibition of torture (Article 3 - Degrading treatment; Inhuman treatment; Positive obligations) (Substantive aspect); Non-pecuniary damage - award (Article 41 - Non-pecuniary damage; Just satisfaction)
EMD
EMD
2026-09-16
19205/25
Communicated case
RENATO v. ITALY
Italy
The application concerns the length of the civil proceedings to determine whether the applicant’s state of health was compatible with detention.
EMD
EMD
2026-09-15
16936/24
Communicated case
RODRÍGUEZ RODRÍGUEZ v. SPAIN
Spain
The application concerns the termination of the applicant’s mandate as member of Parliament following his conviction and sentence.
EMD
EMD
2026-09-15
13022/24
Communicated case
IDE v. THE UNITED KINGDOM
United Kingdom
On 18 May 2005 the applicant was arrested on suspicion of assault occasioning grievous bodily harm and remanded in custody. He was subsequently convicted and on 16 February 2006 was sentenced to indeterminate imprisonment for the public protection (“IPP sentence”) with a minimum term of two years 91 days.
EMD
EMD
2026-09-15
16111/24
Communicated case
FINE DOO SKOPJE AND OTHERS v. NORTH MACEDONIA
North Macedonia
The application concerns the allegedly unlawful, politically motivated and disproportionate demolition of a building constructed by the first applicant (a company owned by the second and third applicants), following a finding by the domestic authorities that the building had been built in violation of the construction permit (for further details see FINE DOO and Others v. North Macedonia (dec.), no. 37948/13, §§ 4-18…
EMD
EMD
2026-09-15
57705/17
Communicated case
DIPALO v. ITALY
Italy
La requête concerne la condamnation pour diffamation du requérant, conducteur d’un programme radiophonique à diffusion locale. Certaines de ses émissions firent l’objet de plaintes déposées par des particuliers, mentionnés par le requérant, qui se plaignaient de propos « offensants, moqueurs et injurieux ». Par arrêt de la cour d’appel de Bari du 12 décembre 2014, le requérant fut condamné à un an et deux mois d’empr…
EMD
EMD – Committee
2026-09-15
29949/20
Judgment
CASE OF BENLİ v. TÜRKİYE
Türkiye
Violation of Article 8 - Right to respect for private and family life (Article 8-1 - Respect for home; Respect for private life)
EMD
EMD
2026-09-15
28849/23
Decision
MANAVIDIS v. GREECE
Greece
Inadmissible (Art. 35) Admissibility criteria; (Art. 35-3-a) Manifestly ill-founded; (Art. 35-3-a) Ratione personae
EMD
EMD – Committee
2026-09-15
46201/21
Judgment
CASE OF LIMP v. HUNGARY
Hungary
Violation of Article 3 - Prohibition of torture (Article 3 - Degrading treatment; Inhuman treatment) (Substantive aspect); Violation of Article 3 - Prohibition of torture (Article 3 - Effective investigation) (Procedural aspect)
EMD
EMD
2026-09-15
28849/23
Legal summary
Manavidis v. Greece (dec.)
Greece
Inadmissible (Art. 35) Admissibility criteria; (Art. 35-3-a) Manifestly ill-founded; (Art. 35-3-a) Ratione personae
EMD
EMD
2026-09-14
4168/24
Communicated case
ÇETİN v. TÜRKİYE
Türkiye
The application concerns a disciplinary sanction, namely dismissal, imposed on the applicant on account of political statements that he had made against the ruling party, the Justice and Development Party (the AKP), in the context of the 2014 elections.
EMD
EMD
2026-09-14
24360/26
Communicated case
MONTES FORTUNA v. SPAIN
Spain
The case concerns the length of civil proceedings regarding the applicant’s claim for a disability pension. On 18 December 2024, the applicant lodged an application for a disability pension, which was dismissed by the Social Security authorities on 20 March 2025. She appealed before the administrative authorities on 16 April 2025, which dismissed her claim on 4 June 2025. On 27 June 2025, she lodged a complaint with …
EMD
EMD
2026-09-14
30039/20, 8445/21, 17963/21, 31382/21, 24522/22, 45548/22, 3482/25
Communicated case
ATAK v. TÜRKİYE and 6 other applications
Türkiye
The applications mainly concern the pre-trial detention of the applicants, who were all judges or prosecutors at the material time, on suspicion of membership of FETÖ/PDY (an organisation described by the Turkish authorities as “Fetullahist Terror Organisation / Parallel State Structure”), in the aftermath of the attempted coup d’état which took place on 15 July 2016.
EMD
EMD
2026-09-11
17616/25, 18728/25
Communicated case
BILANIVSKYI GIRNYCHNO-ZBAGACHUVALNYY KOMBINAT, TOV v. UKRAINE and 1 other application
Ukraine
The applications concern economic restrictions (sanctions) imposed on the applicants under the Sanctions Act (see, for the context, M.S.L., TOV v. Ukraine, no. 18049/18, §§ 5-11, 16 October 2025) and the alleged unfairness of proceedings in which they sought to challenge them.
EMD
EMD
2026-09-11
6565/20
Communicated case
CHERNOVETSKYY v. UKRAINE
Ukraine
The application concerns defamation proceedings brought by the applicant (a businessman and, from 2006 to 2012, Kyiv mayor) against O., a private online media outlet, and Mr K., a former Member of Ukrainian Parliament (from 2007 to 2012).
EMD
EMD
2026-09-11
19179/20
Communicated case
RIFAI v. ARMENIA
Armenia
The application concerns the alleged failure of the domestic authorities to conduct an effective criminal investigation into the allegedly fraudulent transfer of the applicant’s ownership interest in a private company.
EMD
EMD
2026-09-11
20234/26
Communicated case
AJDER v. SERBIA
Serbia
The application concerns proceedings related to the applicant’s custody over, maintenance of and contact with his two minor children, following his separation from their mother. Those proceeding were brought in 2020 and were partly finished by 2024. The proceedings concerning the applicant’s contact with his children, however, are still pending. On 10 February 2026 the Constitutional Court dismissed the applicant’s c…
EU
EU-Domstolen
2026-09-10
C-330/25
Judgment (Court of Justice)
Raidió Teilifís Éireann (RTÉ) mod Commissioner for Environmental Information (C-330/25)
Raidió Teilifís Éireann (RTÉ) mod Commissioner for Environmental Information
AI **Sagens fakta**
Sagen omhandler en anmodning om præjudiciel afgørelse fra High Court (ret i første instans, Irland) om fortolkningen af artikel 2, nr. 1) og 2), og artikel 6, stk. 1 og 2, i Europa-Parlamentets og Rådets direktiv 2003/4/EF af 28. januar 2003 om offentlig adgang til miljøoplysninger og om ophævelse af Rådets direktiv 90/313/EØF.
**Retlige spørgsmål**
Anmodningen om præjudiciel afgørelse vedrører fo…
EU
EU-Domstolen
2026-09-10
C-655/24
Judgment (Court of Justice)
EZ (C-655/24)
EZ
Præjudiciel forelæggelse – område med frihed, sikkerhed og retfærdighed – retligt samarbejde i straffesager – rammeafgørelse 2005/212/RIA – konfiskation af udbytte, redskaber og formuegoder fra strafbart forhold – artikel 2 – materielt anvendelsesområde – færdselsforseelse, som straffes med frihedsstraf på mere end et år – forhold bestående i at have ført et motorkøretøj under påvirkning af alkohol – direktiv 2014/42…
EMD
EMD
2026-09-10
24469/22
Communicated case
DIMITRIADIS v. GREECE
Greece
The application concerns the final conviction of the applicant for selling drugs on a professional basis by taking into account a previous non-final conviction, which was later quashed and of which the applicant was ultimately acquitted.
EMD
EMD
2026-09-10
2652/22, 12977/23, 33015/23, 2665/25, 1034/26, 4644/26
Communicated case
THEODOROLEAS v. GREECE and 5 other applications
Greece
The applications concern the dismissal of the applicants’ claims for compensation against the Greek State for damage allegedly caused by errors of judicial bodies. These dismissals followed a departure by the Supreme Administrative Court (‘SAC’) from its previous case-law in judgment no. 800/2021, with the result that such claims were no longer eligible for judicial review for an indefinite period, pending the adopti…
EMD
EMD
2026-09-10
21757/26
Communicated case
G.C. v. GREECE
Greece
The application concerns the respondent State’s alleged failure to conduct an effective investigation into the applicant’s criminal complaint of being a victim of child pornography offences at the age of thirteen, which ultimately resulted in the prosecution of one alleged offender becoming time-barred.
EMD
EMD
2026-09-10
31052/22
Decision
ĐINIĆ v. CROATIA
Croatia
Inadmissible
EMD
EMD
2026-09-10
18235/22
Decision
HINIĆ v. CROATIA
Croatia
Inadmissible
EMD
EMD
2026-09-10
45849/20
Decision
MYKYTAS v. UKRAINE
Ukraine
Inadmissible
EMD
EMD
2026-09-10
8276/21
Decision
ZAKHIDNA ENERGETYCHNA GRUPA, TOV v. UKRAINE
Ukraine
Inadmissible
EMD
EMD
2026-09-10
37042/20
Decision
S.S. v. POLAND
Poland
Struck out of the list
EMD
EMD
2026-09-10
22440/22
Decision
TRĒGERS v. LATVIA
Latvia
Inadmissible
EMD
EMD
2026-09-10
23803/23
Decision
SUVERÉNNÍ ŘÁD MALTÉZSKÝCH RYTÍŘŮ - ČESKÉ VELKOPŘEVORSTVÍ v. THE CZECH REPUBLIC
Czech Republic
Partly struck out of the list; Partly inadmissible
EMD
EMD
2026-09-10
60797/13
Decision
AVÎNT S.A. AND DANREM-TRANS S.R.L. v. THE REPUBLIC OF MOLDOVA
Moldova
Struck out of the list
EMD
EMD
2026-09-10
9188/25
Decision
HOUŽVIČKA v. THE CZECH REPUBLIC
Czech Republic
Inadmissible
EMD
EMD
2026-09-10
46401/22
Decision
ŘÍMSKOKATOLICKÁ FARNOST - PRELATURA ČESKÝ KRUMLOV v. THE CZECH REPUBLIC
Czech Republic
Struck out of the list
EMD
EMD – Chamber
2026-09-10
17596/23
Judgment
CASE OF LACOTE v. BELGIUM
Belgium
No violation of Article 6+6-3-c - Right to a fair trial (Article 6 - Criminal proceedings; Article 6-1 - Fair hearing) (Article 6-3-c - Defence through legal assistance; Article 6-3 - Rights of defence; Article 6 - Right to a fair trial)
Separate opinion(s) attached.
EMD
EMD – Committee
2026-09-10
10241/19, 55130/19, 26297/23
Judgment
CASE OF FRATELLI ROMANO S.P.A. AND OTHERS v. ITALY
Italy
Violation of Article 6 - Right to a fair trial (Article 6 - Civil proceedings; Article 6-1 - Access to court)
EMD
EMD
2026-09-09
77135/17
Communicated case
MINIĆ v. SERBIA
Serbia
The application concerns divergent domestic case-law in respect of claims for the payment of salary supplements for overtime, night work and work on public holidays.
EMD
EMD
2026-09-09
18556/20
Communicated case
RYEZNIK v. UKRAINE
Ukraine
The case concerns the applicant’s obligation to pay for heat supply services which were never provided to him. In 2009 the applicant got his flat disconnected from the district heating network after the competent local authority had approved his application to that effect. On 11 August 2009 the applicant and representatives of the aforementioned authority and the installation company signed a report confirming that t…
EMD
EMD
2026-09-09
28098/26
Communicated case
GALSTEAN v. THE REPUBLIC OF MOLDOVA
Moldova
The application concerns the refusal, in 2026, to grant the applicant custody of his daughter, who has lived exclusively with him since 2019. The refusal was based on a 2021 Belarusian custody order favouring the mother.
EMD
EMD
2026-09-09
29426/24
Communicated case
PETRENOV v. THE REPUBLIC OF MOLDOVA
Moldova
The application concerns a decision by the Moldovan courts to establish the applicant’s child’s place of residence as being with the mother, allegedly in the absence of jurisdiction and despite a pre-existing shared custody arrangement in Germany.
EMD
EMD
2026-09-09
27697/22, 35147/22, 56742/22
Communicated case
SKREBETS AND DERKO v. RUSSIA and 2 other applications
Russia
The applications concern the alleged ill-treatment and unlawful detention of a number of Ukrainian prisoners of war who were reportedly captured and detained by the Russian armed forces during the full-scale invasion in Donetsk, Kharkiv and Luhansk regions, in April 2022 (see also Ukraine and the Netherlands v. Russia [GC], nos. 8019/16 and 3 others, §§ 68-69, 71, 9 July 2025).
EMD
EMD
2026-09-09
41480/17, 51617/17, 4440/19, 8081/19, 9033/19, 14751/19, 19788/19, 20359/19, 23504/19, 27600/19, 40777/19, 47482/19, 49430/19, 50222/19, 41583/20, 46666/20, 47332/20
Communicated case
PAKHAR v. RUSSIA AND UKRAINE and 16 other applications
Russia
The applications emanate from the armed conflict with Russia in the east of Ukraine. Each of the applicants was convicted of crimes by Ukrainian courts on various dates predating the outbreak of the armed conflict. Applicant no. 2, Mr Oleksiy Varganov, applicant no. 8, Mr Ruslan Kuzmin, and applicant no. 9, Mr Sergiy Rybalko were sentenced to eleven, nine and fifteen years of imprisonment, respectively. All other app…
EMD
EMD
2026-09-09
20493/22, 31258/22, 39275/22
Communicated case
MELNYCHENKO v. RUSSIA and 2 other applications
Russia
The applications concern the alleged ill-treatment, forced labour, and unlawful detention of a number of Ukrainian prisoners of war who were reportedly captured and detained by the Russian armed forces during the full‑scale invasion in Mariupol, Donetsk region, between March and June 2022 (see also Ukraine and the Netherlands v. Russia [GC], nos. 8019/16 and 3 others, § 69, 9 July 2025).
EMD
EMD
2026-09-09
48834/20
Communicated case
CALABRA MACERI E SERVIZI S.P.A. v. ITALY
Italy
The applicant is a company operating in the waste collection sector. In 2014 it concluded a contract with a Chinese company for the sale of 15 containers of plastic waste for export to China. In early March 2014, the containers were taken to the Gioia Tauro harbour for shipping to China.
EMD
EMD
2026-09-09
15506/22
Communicated case
GORBACHEVSKA AND GORBACHEVSKYY v. RUSSIA
Russia
The application concerns the alleged risk to life of, and ill‑treatment suffered by, a Ukrainian prisoner of war (the second applicant) who was reportedly captured and detained by the Russian armed forces during the full‑scale invasion in the Kyiv region in March 2022 (see also Ukraine and the Netherlands v. Russia [GC], nos. 8019/16 and 3 others, § 67, 9 July 2025).
EU
EU-Domstolen
2026-09-08
C-298/23
Judgment (Court of Justice)
Inter IKEA Systems BV mod Algemeen Vlaams Belang VZW m.fl (C-298/23)
Inter IKEA Systems BV mod Algemeen Vlaams Belang VZW m.fl
Præjudiciel forelæggelse – varemærker – forordning (EU) 2017/1001 – artikel 9, stk. 2, litra c) – direktiv (EU) 2015/2436 – artikel 10, stk. 2, litra c) – artikel 10, stk. 6 – rettigheder knyttet til et varemærke – begrebet »erhvervsmæssig brug af ethvert tegn i forbindelse med varer eller tjenesteydelser« – begrebet »rimelig grund« – Den Europæiske Unions charter om grundlæggende rettigheder – afvejning af grundlægg…
EMD
EMD
2026-09-08
59306/18, 12769/19, 12879/19, 20701/19
Communicated case
SHAVELA v. RUSSIA AND UKRAINE and 3 other applications
Russia
The applications emanate from the armed conflict with Russia in the east of Ukraine. Each of the applicants was convicted of crimes by Ukrainian courts and sentenced to life imprisonment. The applicants’ sentences became final on various dates preceding the establishment of the effective control over the east of Ukraine by the Russian Federation (see Ukraine and the Netherlands v. Russia (dec.) [GC], nos. 8019/16 and…
EMD
EMD
2026-09-08
34789/23
Decision
PUNDA v. SERBIA
Serbia
Inadmissible
EMD
EMD
2026-09-08
14157/23
Decision
KASAPOVIĆ v. SERBIA
Serbia
Inadmissible
EMD
EMD
2026-09-08
27905/24
Decision
PETROVIĆ v. SERBIA
Serbia
Inadmissible
EMD
EMD
2026-09-08
2898/20
Decision
DUMITRU v. ROMANIA
Romania
Inadmissible
EMD
EMD
2026-09-08
33538/17
Decision
DRAŠKIĆ v. SERBIA
Serbia
Inadmissible
EMD
EMD
2026-09-08
16430/22
Decision
DIMITROVA AND OTHERS v. BULGARIA
Bulgaria
Inadmissible
EMD
EMD
2026-09-08
5359/23
Decision
PETRAK v. NORTH MACEDONIA
North Macedonia
Inadmissible
EMD
EMD
2026-09-08
14510/25
Decision
ALMADHI v. ALBANIA
Albania
Inadmissible
EMD
EMD
2026-09-08
37693/20
Decision
SIDEREVA v. BULGARIA
Bulgaria
Inadmissible
EMD
EMD – Chamber
2026-09-08
64510/17, 39664/18
Judgment
CASE OF ABDULALIYEV AND ISMAYILOV v. AZERBAIJAN
Azerbaijan
Violation of Article 3 - Prohibition of torture (Article 3 - Degrading treatment; Inhuman treatment) (Substantive aspect); Violation of Article 3 - Prohibition of torture (Article 3 - Degrading treatment; Inhuman treatment) (Substantive aspect); No violation of Article 3 - Prohibition of torture (Article 3 - Degrading treatment; Inhuman treatment) (Substantive aspect); Violation of Article 3 - Prohibition of torture …
EMD
EMD – Chamber
2026-09-08
7481/23
Judgment
CASE OF A.A. v. THE NETHERLANDS
Netherlands
No violation of Article 8 - Right to respect for private and family life (Article 8-1 - Respect for family life)
EMD
EMD – Chamber
2026-09-08
27153/20
Judgment
CASE OF ALEXANDROS SAVVAS v. GREECE
Greece
Violation of Article 10 - Freedom of expression - {general} (Article 10-1 - Freedom of expression); Pecuniary and non-pecuniary damage - award (Article 41 - Non-pecuniary damage; Pecuniary damage; Just satisfaction)
EMD
EMD – Committee
2026-09-08
31727/23
Judgment
CASE OF NADASHVILI v. GEORGIA
Georgia
Violation of Article 6 - Right to a fair trial (Article 6 - Civil proceedings; Article 6-1 - Reasonable time)
EMD
EMD
2026-09-07
33480/24
Communicated case
TURHAN v. TÜRKİYE
Türkiye
The application concerns the domestic courts’ refusal to grant the applicant custody of her children in the context of divorce proceedings on the basis of her alleged links with a terrorist organisation.
EMD
EMD
2026-09-07
43792/21, 49730/21, 10865/22, 12184/22, 12188/22, 16856/22, 29175/22, 17466/24, 19170/24, 19457/24, 11384/25
Communicated case
TAŞKIN v. TÜRKİYE and 10 other applications
Türkiye
The applications concern disciplinary sanctions imposed on the applicants (for details regarding the nature of and reasons given for the sanctions, see the Appendix), civil servants at the material time, on account of their participation in certain public assemblies, such as marches and demonstrations, and/or making press statements and chanting slogans during these assemblies.
EMD
EMD
2026-09-07
7829/23
Communicated case
M.A. v. POLAND
Poland
The application concerns various sets of proceedings aimed at the expulsion of the applicant (a lawfully resident alien) on the grounds of national security.
EMD
EMD
2026-09-07
10844/26
Communicated case
B.N. v. TÜRKİYE
Türkiye
The applicant is an Uzbek national who left Uzbekistan and entered Türkiye lawfully in 2014, alleging pressure and surveillance by Uzbek authorities due to his individual religious practices. In 2022 criminal proceedings were brought against him in Türkiye for alleged membership of a terrorist organisation; however, he was acquitted of all charges by the Istanbul 29th Assize Court.
EMD
EMD
2026-09-07
23096/25, 26443/25, 26476/25, 26573/25, 26586/25, 26668/25, 27166/25, 32596/25, 34544/25
Communicated case
KÖROĞLU v. TÜRKİYE
Türkiye
The applications concern the alleged unfairness of criminal proceedings against several members of the Turkish Armed Forces (“the TAF”), holding various ranks, in connection with their alleged involvement in the attempted coup on the night of 15 July 2016, on account of their deployment to and acts carried out at the Ankara 4th Main Jet Base Command (“the Akıncı base”). According to the domestic courts, the events fo…
EMD
EMD
2026-09-07
34092/24, 9044/25, 10887/25
Communicated case
S.S. v. THE NETHERLANDS and 2 other applications
Netherlands
The applications concern the applicants’ pre-placement detention in ordinary prisons pending their transfer to a suitable institution under an order for placement at the disposal of the Government with confinement in a custodial clinic (terbeschikkingstelling met bevel tot verpleging van overheidswege - “TBS”). Time-expired convict prisoners awaiting transfer to a suitable institution under a TBS order are colloquial…
EMD
EMD
2026-09-07
10866/24
Communicated case
KOVÁCS v. HUNGARY
Hungary
The application concerns criminal proceedings in which the applicant was found guilty of, among other things, espionage against the institutions of the European Union under Article 261/A of the Criminal Code.
EMD
EMD
2026-09-07
26822/25
Communicated case
PAVLOVIĆ AND KOLOMPAR v. SERBIA
Serbia
The application primarily concerns alleged shortcomings in the investigation into the circumstances surrounding the death of the applicants’ son.
EU
EU-Domstolen
2026-09-03
C-147/25
Judgment (Court of Justice)
»Inter Rao Lietuva« AB mod Finansinių nusikaltimų tyrimo tarnyba prie Lietuvos Respublikos vidaus reikalų ministerijos (C-147/25)
»Inter Rao Lietuva« AB mod Finansinių nusikaltimų tyrimo tarnyba prie Lietuvos Respublikos vidaus reikalų ministerijos
AI **Sagen**
Facts:
* Inter Rao Lietuva AB er et litauisk selskab, der er blevet pålagt en indefrysning af pengemidler og økonomiske ressourcer af Finansinių nusikaltimų tyrimo tarnyba prie Lietuvos Respublikos vidaus reikalų ministerijos (FNTT) på grund af forbindelse til præsidenten for Den Russiske Føderation.
* Sagen omhandler fortolkningen af artikel 2, stk. 1, i Rådets afgørelse 2014/145/FUSP og artikel 2, stk. …
EU
EU-Domstolen
2026-09-03
C-798/24
Judgment (Court of Justice)
A m.fl (C-798/24)
A m.fl
Præjudiciel forelæggelse – beskyttelse af fysiske personer i forbindelse med behandling af personoplysninger – forordning (EU) 2016/679 – artikel 5 – principper for behandling af personoplysninger – artikel 6 – lovlig behandling – selskabsret – direktiv (EU) 2017/1132 – artikel 14 – dokumenter og oplysninger, der skal offentliggøres – begrebet »personer, der deltager i ledelsen af, i tilsynet med eller i kontrollen m…
EU
EU-Domstolen
2026-09-03
C-606/24
Judgment (Court of Justice)
XY m.fl. mod Ministerul Finanţelor (C-606/24)
XY m.fl. mod Ministerul Finanţelor
AI **Sagens fakta**
Sagen omhandler en tvist mellem flere fysiske personer og Ministerul Finanţelor (finansministeriet) i Rumænien vedrørende genberegning og udbetaling af lønkrav som personale, der aflønnes med offentlige midler.
**Lovlige spørgsmål**
Anmodningen om præjudiciel afgørelse vedrører fortolkningen af artikel 2 TEU og artikel 19, stk. 1, andet afsnit, TEU samt af artikel 47 i Den Europæiske Unions charte…
EMD
EMD
2026-09-03
47346/22, 17898/24, 20359/24, 27218/24, 27883/24, 28187/24, 29867/24, 31098/24, 32161/24, 33090/24, 33258/24, 33613/24, 34050/24, 34116/24, 36433/24, 37227/24, 657/25
Communicated case
OCHERETNA AND DOTSENKO v. RUSSIA and 16 other applications
Russia
Following a preliminary examination of the admissibility of the applications on 3 September 2026, the Court decided, under Rule 54 § 2 (b) of the Rules of Court, that notice of the applications should be given to the Government of Russia. It is to be noted that the issue of jurisdiction over the area where the incidents giving rise to the complaints allegedly took place has been examined and decided by the Grand Cham…
EMD
EMD
2026-09-03
69644/17, 47441/19, 20296/20, 57465/21, 36341/22
Communicated case
YEFREMOV v. RUSSIA and 4 other applications
Russia
Following a preliminary examination of the admissibility of the applications on 3 September 2026, the Court decided, under Rule 54 § 2 (b) of the Rules of Court, that notice of the applications should be given to the Government of Russia.
EMD
EMD
2026-09-03
40921/22, 47418/22, 20889/24, 25881/24, 26657/24, 27462/24, 27797/24, 28261/24, 29768/24, 29902/24, 31449/24, 31520/24, 31537/24, 31559/24, 31931/24, 31959/24, 32134/24, 32539/24, 32544/24, 33678/24, 36935/24, 37035/24, 37102/24, 37139/24, 37563/24, 37577/24, 37717/24, 2574/25
Communicated case
KLYMOV v. RUSSIA and 27 other applications
Russia
Following a preliminary examination of the admissibility of the applications on 3 September 2026, the Court decided, under Rule 54 § 2 (b) of the Rules of Court, that notice of the applications should be given to the Government of Russia. It is to be noted that the issue of jurisdiction over the area where the incidents giving rise to the complaints allegedly took place has been examined and decided by the Grand Cham…
EMD
EMD
2026-09-03
21688/18, 19186/21, 19194/21, 19196/21, 38816/21, 48198/21, 28547/22
Communicated case
ASANOV v. RUSSIA and 6 other applications
Russia
Following a preliminary examination of the admissibility of the applications on 3 September 2026, the Court decided, under Rule 54 § 2 (b) of the Rules of Court, that notice of the applications should be given to the Government of Russia.
EMD
EMD
2026-09-03
25564/24, 27695/24, 28821/24, 31328/24, 33340/24, 35005/24, 35164/24, 1481/25
Communicated case
MAKHSMA v. RUSSIA and 7 other applications
Russia
Following a preliminary examination of the admissibility of the applications on 3 September 2026, the Court decided, under Rule 54 § 2 (b) of the Rules of Court, that notice of the applications should be given to the Government of Russia. It is to be noted that the issue of jurisdiction over the area where the incidents giving rise to the complaints allegedly took place has been examined and decided by the Grand Cham…
EMD
EMD
2026-09-03
49943/22
Communicated case
SULEYMANOV v. RUSSIA
Russia
The application concerns restrictions imposed by the Russian authorities on the applicant’s freedom of movement, following the Russian Federation’s assertion of jurisdiction over Crimea (see Ukraine v. Russia (re Crimea) (dec.) [GC], nos. 20958/14 and 38334/18, § 335, 16 December 2020).
EMD
EMD
2026-09-03
15995/18, 38686/22
Communicated case
KARAMETOV v. RUSSIA and 1 other application
Russia
Following a preliminary examination of the admissibility of the applications on 3 September 2026, the Court decided, under Rule 54 § 2 (b) of the Rules of Court, that notice of the applications should be given to the Government of Russia.
EMD
EMD
2026-09-03
23503/19
Communicated case
CHESNOKOVA v. RUSSIA
Russia
The application concerns restrictions imposed by the Russian authorities on the applicant’s right to leave Crimea following the Russian Federation’s assertion of jurisdiction over the peninsula (see Ukraine v. Russia (re Crimea) (dec.) [GC], nos. 20958/14 and 38334/18, § 335, 16 December 2020).
EMD
EMD
2026-09-03
26840/26
Communicated case
MATOUSSI v. DENMARK
Denmark
AI 1) Fakta:
Hafed Matoussi, en tunesiske national født i Danmark i 1991, havde en kriminalitet og blev i 2018 pålagt udvisning med en varig re-indsættelsesforbud. Efter flere forlængelser af udvisningsordren blev Matoussi pålagt at bo på Kærshovedgård return center om natten og mellem dagsregisteringen på centeret og politiet. Han indledte en civil sag mod Return Agency, men fik ikke ret i første instans eller på appel…
EMD
EMD
2026-09-03
4489/26
Communicated case
C.S. v. MALTA
Malta
The application concerns the applicant’s separation from her son. The applicant (mother) is undergoing separation proceedings before the Family Court and originally had care and custody of the couple’s child, K. The Child Protection Directorate (AA) was monitoring the situation as of 2019 as K was reluctant to see his father for supervised visits. However, on 18 July 2022 AA submitted that they should step aside from…
EMD
EMD
2026-09-03
41508/22
Communicated case
IMERAJ v. ALBANIA
Albania
1. The applicant, Ms Elizabeta Imeraj, is an Albanian national, who was born in 1979 and lives in Tirana. She is represented before the Court by Mr G. Thuan Dit Dieudonné, a lawyer practising in Strasbourg, as well as by Mr S. Stavros and Mr T. Dalacouras, lawyers practising in Athens, Strasbourg and Rodopi, Greece.
EMD
EMD – Committee
2026-09-03
35845/24
Judgment
CASE OF SPYRIDONIDIS v. ARMENIA
Armenia
Violation of Article 8 - Right to respect for private and family life (Article 8 - Positive obligations; Article 8-1 - Respect for family life)
EMD
EMD – Committee
2026-09-03
5442/15
Judgment
CASE OF TOVMASYAN v. ARMENIA
Armenia
Violation of Article 2 - Right to life (Article 2-1 - Effective investigation) (Procedural aspect)
EMD
EMD – Committee
2026-09-03
53846/16
Judgment
CASE OF SARGSYAN v. ARMENIA
Armenia
Violation of Article 11 - Freedom of assembly and association (Article 11-1 - Freedom of peaceful assembly)
EMD
EMD – Committee
2026-09-03
5837/17
Judgment
CASE OF NEW GENERATION HUMANITARIAN NGO v. ARMENIA
Armenia
Violation of Article 6 - Right to a fair trial (Article 6 - Civil proceedings; Article 6-1 - Access to court)
EMD
EMD – Committee
2026-09-03
6818/23
Judgment
CASE OF ASLANYAN v. ARMENIA
Armenia
Violation of Article 8 - Right to respect for private and family life (Article 8 - Positive obligations; Article 8-1 - Respect for family life)
EMD
EMD
2026-09-03
33087/17
Decision
C.P.R.R.I.C. "MEŞTER" v. THE REPUBLIC OF MOLDOVA
Moldova
Struck out of the list
EMD
EMD
2026-09-03
24201/17
Decision
PANKOV v. UKRAINE
Ukraine
Inadmissible
EMD
EMD
2026-09-03
8195/22
Decision
KOS v. POLAND
Poland
Struck out of the list
EMD
EMD
2026-09-03
14878/24
Decision
NOWAK v. POLAND
Poland
Struck out of the list
EMD
EMD
2026-09-03
11663/25
Decision
VOS v. THE NETHERLANDS
Netherlands
Struck out of the list