⚖️ RKLAW
Log in

Decisions 709 found

All Domsdatabasen · 610 Højesteret · 144 HUDOC (EMD) · 565 EUR-Lex (CJEU) · 478
Reset
Results load automatically as you scroll
EMD EMD 2026-08-24 1373/26 Communicated case

DEGNER v. GERMANY

Germany
The application concerns the failure of the Oldenburg Court of Appeal to provide reasons for its decision not to refer the matter to the Court of Justice of the European Union (CJEU) for a preliminary ruling notwithstanding the applicant’s request in this respect.
EMD EMD 2026-08-24 38616/25 Communicated case

TIALINI GMBH & CO. KG v. GERMANY

Germany
The application concerns the failure of the Federal Court of Justice to provide reasons for its decision not to refer the matter to the Court of Justice of the European Union (CJEU) for a preliminary ruling notwithstanding the applicant company’s request in this respect.
EMD EMD 2026-08-24 33164/20 Communicated case

RYMSHA v. UKRAINE

Ukraine
The applicant bought a flat from a private party. Domestic courts later found that the flat had been alienated from a previous owner through a fictitious transaction and ordered its return to the previous owner’s alleged heir. The applicant considers that the courts’ findings and the order requiring the return of the flat breached his rights under Article 6 of the Convention and Article 1 of Protocol No. 1.
EMD EMD 2026-08-24 28299/25 Communicated case

Z v. SPAIN

Spain
The applicant was the victim of a sexual assault in Pamplona in July 2016. Her attackers were convicted for rape and sentenced to fifteen years of imprisonment. The case attracted great media and public attention in Spain and became known as the Manada case. The Manada was the name of a WhatsApp group used by the convicted to communicate among themselves.
EMD EMD 2026-08-24 2899/26 Communicated case

MARJANOVIĆ SLAVKOVIĆ v. SERBIA

Serbia
The application concerns the reasonableness and duration of the applicant’s pre-trial detention. By an order of the Novi Sad High Court of 23 November 2024, the applicant was placed in detention on remand. Her detention was subsequently extended on several occasions and remained in force until 17 June 2025, when it was replaced by house arrest. Between 20 December 2024 and 20 June 2025, the applicant lodged seven con…
HR Højesteret 2026-08-21 36329/2025 Dom/kendelse

Ikke krav på godtgørelse for bl.a. forsinket erhvervelse af dansk indfødsret

Part 1, Part 2, Part 4, Part 5, Part 6, Part 7, Part 8, Part 9, Part 10, Part 11, Part 12, Part 13, Part 14, Part 15, Part 16, Part 17, Part 18, Part 19, Part 21, Part 22, Part 24 og Part 25 mod Udlæn
AI Højesteret har behandlet en sag om godtgørelse og erstatning til følgende personer, der har søgt dansk indfødsret: * Part 1 * Part 2 * Part 8 * Part 25 * Part 4 * Part 5 * Part 6 * Part 7 * Part 12 * Part 13 * Part 21 * Part 22 * Part 24 * Part 9 * Part 10 * Part 11 * Part 14 * Part 15 * Part 16 * Part 17 * Part 18 * Part 19 Højesteret har vurderet, om disse personer har krav på godtgørelse og erstatning på grund a…
DDB Højesteret 2026-08-21 BS-36329/2025-HJR Dom

Højesteret stadfæster Landsrettens afgørelse i sag om, hvorvidt appellanterne, der har været statsløse, har krav på godtgørelse og erstatning for følger af forsinket erhvervelse af dansk indfødsret

Udlændinge- og Integrationsministeriet
AI Højesterets dom i sagen om godtgørelse og erstatning for statsløse, der har været udsat for forsinket behandling af ansøgninger om dansk indfødsret, og for diskrimination og krænkelse af privatlivet ved indsamling og behandling af personoplysninger.
HR Højesteret 2026-08-20 99/2025 Dom/kendelse

En sagsbehandlingstid på knap 4 år frem til byrettens dom kunne ikke medføre, at frakendelsen af Ts førerret blev gjort betinget

Anklagemyndigheden mod T
AI **Dom i Højesteret, sagsnummer 99/2025** **Facts** T blev sigtet for at have kørt bil efter at have indtaget bevidsthedspåvirkende stoffer og selv om hun var frakendt førerretten. Sagen var blevet ført frem til Højesteret efter at have været behandlet i Københavns Byret og Østre Landsret. **Legal question** Spørgsmålet var, om frakendelsen af Ts førerret skulle bortfalde eller gøres betinget på grund af lang sags…
HR Højesteret 2026-08-20 97/2025 Dom/kendelse

En sagsbehandlingstid på knap 3 ½ år frem til byrettens dom kunne ikke medføre, at frakendelsen af Ts førerret blev gjort betinget

Anklagemyndigheden mod T
AI **Dom i Højesteret (97/2025)** **Facts:** T blev sigtet for overtrædelse af færdselsloven den 5. maj 2020. Sagen var under behandling i ca. 5 år, før Københavns Byret afsagde dom den 10. oktober 2023. T blev dømt til bøde og ubetinget frakendt førerretten i 6 måneder. Landsretten stadfæstede byrettens dom den 23. maj 2025. **Legal question:** Om frakendelsen af Ts førerret skal gøres betinget som følge af lang sa…
DDB Højesteret 2026-08-20 SS-97/2025-HJR Dom

Højesteret stadfæster Landsrettens afgørelse med den ændring, at statskassen betaler sagsomkostninger for Landsretten, i sag om hastighedsovertrædelse

AI **Sag 97/2025** **Facts** Tiltalte blev sigtet for overtrædelse af færdselsloven den 5. maj 2020. Sagen var under behandling i næsten 6 år, før Højesteret afgjorde sagen. Tiltalte blev dømt til ubetinget frakendelse af førerretten i 6 måneder. **Legal question** Skal frakendelsen af Tiltaltes førerret gøres betinget på grund af lang sagsbehandlingstid? **Outcome og reasoning** Højesteret stadfæster landsrettens…
DDB Højesteret 2026-08-20 SS-99/2025-HJR Dom

Højesteret stadfæster Landsrettens afgørelse i sag om kørsel i bevidsthedspåvirket tilstand, således at førerretten frakendes ubetinget i 5 år i stedet for betinget i 3 år

AI **Dom i Højesteret, SS-99/2025-HJR, 20. august 2026** **Facts** Tiltalte blev sigtet for kørsel i bevidsthedspåvirket tilstand og blev idømt en betinget dom uden førerretsfrakendelse af Københavns Byret. Landsretten ændrede dommen til en ubetinget førerretsfrakendelse i 5 år. Tiltalte anker dommen og påstår, at frakendelsen bør bortfalde eller gøres betinget på grund af lang sagsbehandlingstid. **Legal question** …
EMD EMD 2026-08-20 12930/21, 42966/22, 24057/23, 37406/23, 38227/23 Communicated case

OCHERETYANYY v. UKRAINE and 4 other applications

Ukraine
The applications concern the applicants’ deprivation of property in favour of the State. In applications nos. 12930/21, 42966/22, 37406/23 and 38227/23 the applicants purchased from private persons commercial premises which had initially belonged to municipal property of the city of Dnipro and which had subsequently been sold at public auctions following the bankruptcy and liquidation of the respective municipal ente…
EMD EMD 2026-08-20 25786/23, 181/25, 16335/25, 17348/25 Communicated case

YUZHNYY ELEKTROTEKHNICHNYY ZAVOD, TOV v. UKRAINE and 3 other applications

Ukraine
The applications concern the applicants’ deprivation of property bought at public auctions. The applicants bought some real property at public auctions conducted by the State Bailiffs’ Service or the Deposit Guarantee Fund in connection with the relevant proceedings against private persons or entities which were unable to pay off their creditors (see Appendix below). Those auctions were later invalidated for various …
EMD EMD 2026-08-20 3073/25, 8855/26, 14836/24, 45663/22, 34219/25, 34263/25, 30352/23, 21044/25 Communicated case

VALIEVA v. SWITZERLAND and 7 other applications

Switzerland
Les requêtes concernent des sanctions prononcées contre sept athlètes de niveau international pour violation des règles antidopage, au sens du code mondial antidopage (CMAD), sanctions qui ont été confirmées par le Tribunal arbitral du sport (TAS) et le Tribunal fédéral suisse.
EMD EMD 2026-08-20 17736/26, 18767/26 Communicated case

DE LA ROSA CORTINA v. SPAIN and 1 other application

Spain
The applicants are a court prosecutor, Mr. R (“first applicant”), and an association of prosecutors, “Asociación de Fiscales” (“second applicant”). The first applicant applied to the specific role of “Court Prosecutor for Minors” at the Public Prosecutor’s Office. On 30 March 2021, a different candidate, Mr. E, was appointed. He belonged to a different association of prosecutors, “Unión Progresista de Fiscales”. The …
EMD EMD 2026-08-20 18183/25 Communicated case

MICHAIL v. CYPRUS

Cyprus
The application concerns the applicant’s complaint about the application of the Law on Rehabilitation of Convicted Persons (Law 70/1981), which automatically rendered his conviction for manslaughter ineligible for rehabilitation, with the result that it could never become spent, thereby excluding him from employment in his chosen field.
EMD EMD 2026-08-19 23798/20 Communicated case

SAVELYEV v. UKRAINE

Ukraine
The case concerns the alleged unfairness of the administrative-offence proceedings against the applicant. On 20 September 2018 the applicant’s car collided with another vehicle at an uncontrolled intersection. The patrol police drew up an administrative-offence report in respect of the applicant, concluding, on the basis of the accident scheme and the explanations provided by both drivers, that, under the applicable …
EMD EMD 2026-08-17 72796/16, 72798/16, 72799/16, 74936/16, 74938/16, 74939/16, 74942/16, 338/17, 1070/17, 1212/17, 5843/17, 51464/17, 54155/17, 54159/17, 54160/17, 54164/17, 57724/17, 57732/17, 57760/17, 57765/17, 57767/17, 68270/17, 68336/17, 1859/18, 1878/18, 2000/18, 2023/18, 2036/18, 2053/18, 2062/18, 2086/18, 2108/18, 2141/18, 2144/18, 2161/18, 2181/18, 2197/18, 2203/18, 2220/18, 2230/18, 2234/18 Communicated case

AKIN v. TÜRKİYE and 40 other applications

Türkiye
The Statement of facts and the initial questions to the parties are available in HUDOC.
EMD EMD 2026-08-17 18748/24 Communicated case

KJERIMI AND OTHERS v. NORTH MACEDONIA

North Macedonia
The application concerns the applicants’ complaints about the alleged inappropriate procedural response of the domestic authorities to the death of their relative (‘the mother’) and her child (‘the child’), allegedly caused by medical negligence during childbirth. A list of the applicants is set out in the appendix.
EMD EMD 2026-08-17 31204/22 Communicated case

KLUBRÁDIÓ SZOLGÁLTATÓ ZRT v. HUNGARY

Hungary
The application concerns the non-renewal of the applicant company’s licence to use a radio frequency. On 8 November 2019, before the expiry of its broadcasting licence to use a specific radio frequency, the applicant requested the Media Council of the National Media and Infocommunications Authority (NMHH) to renew its licence for a further seven years, without tendering, which is a special opportunity provided to ser…
EMD EMD – Chamber 2026-07-23 39465/23, 43066/23 Judgment

CASE OF DEREVYANKO AND TARASOVA v. UKRAINE

Ukraine
Violation of Article 5 - Right to liberty and security (Article 5-3 - Reasonableness of pre-trial detention); No violation of Article 5 - Right to liberty and security (Article 5-1 - Deprivation of liberty; Article 5-1-c - Reasonable suspicion); Violation of Article 5 - Right to liberty and security (Article 5-3 - Reasonableness of pre-trial detention); Pecuniary damage - claim dismissed (Article 41 - Pecuniary damag…
EMD EMD 2026-07-22 6205/24 Communicated case

M.A. v. ROMANIA

Romania
The application concerns the alleged lack of effectiveness of the criminal investigation into violence inflicted on the applicant by an adult, on 10 July 2022, when the applicant was 9 years old.
EMD EMD 2026-07-21 8755/26 Communicated case

BUALLI v. ALBANIA

Albania
The case concerns the detention of a mentally ill person, subject to involuntary confinement, in an ordinary prison. In the criminal proceedings against the applicant, on 8 February 2001 the Fier District Court found the applicant not criminally liable because of his mental condition, and ordered his involuntary medical treatment in the Tirana Psychiatric Hospital. Following that judgment, the applicant was placed in…
EMD EMD 2026-07-17 64414/19 Communicated case

DIMITROV v. THE REPUBLIC OF MOLDOVA

Moldova
The application concerns the applicant’s administrative conviction for hooliganism in the absence of an oral hearing. On 11 December 2018 the applicant had a dispute with a lawyer inside a courthouse in Chișinău. On 27 February 2019, following that incident and in the absence of the applicant, the police drew up an administrative offence report for hooliganism and fined him 1,000 Moldovan lei – approximately 50 euros…
EMD EMD 2026-07-17 54048/20 Communicated case

KYRYCHENKO v. UKRAINE

Ukraine
The case concerns the applicant’s complaints under Article 1 of Protocol No. 1 and Article 13 of the Convention regarding the allegedly arbitrary retention of his property by the investigating authorities, as well as the alleged damage and eventual loss of some of that property.
EU EU-Domstolen 2026-07-16 C-399/25 P Judgment (Court of Justice)

Elena Petrovna Timchenko mod Rådet for Den Europæiske Union (C-399/25 P)

Elena Petrovna Timchenko mod Rådet for Den Europæiske Union
AI **Sagen** Elena Petrovna Timchenko (appellant) har anlagt sagen mod Rådet for Den Europæiske Union (sagsøgt) og Europa-Kommissionen (intervenient) om annullation af Rådets afgørelse (FUSP) 2023/572 og gennemførelsesforordning (EU) 2023/571 om restriktive foranstaltninger over for tiltag, der underminerer eller truer Ukraines territoriale integritet, suverænitet og uafhængighed. **Facts** Appellanten er ægtefælle t…
EU EU-Domstolen 2026-07-16 C-363/25 P Judgment (Court of Justice)

Dana Astra IOOO mod Rådet for Den Europæiske Union (C-363/25 P)

Dana Astra IOOO mod Rådet for Den Europæiske Union
Appel – restriktive foranstaltninger på baggrund af situationen i Belarus og Belarus’ involvering i den russiske aggression mod Ukraine – lister over personer, enheder og organer, som er omfattet af indefrysningen af midler og økonomiske ressourcer – kriterium for opførelse på disse lister, som er knyttet til fordele draget af eller støtte ydet til Lukasjenkoregimet – opretholdelse af appellantens navn på disse liste…
EU EU-Domstolen 2026-07-16 C-280/25 Judgment (Court of Justice)

Parchetul de pe lângă Curtea de Apel Oradea mod M.G.D (C-280/25)

Parchetul de pe lângă Curtea de Apel Oradea mod M.G.D
AI **Domstolens dom (Store Afdeling)** **Fakta** Sagen omhandler en anmodning om præjudiciel afgørelse fra Înalta Curte de Casaţie şi Justiţie (kassationsdomstol, Rumænien) om fortolkningen af artikel 2 TEU og artikel 4, stk. 2 og 3, TEU, artikel 2, stk. 2, TEUF og artikel 325, stk. 1, TEUF, artikel 49, artikel 52, stk. 3, og artikel 53 i Den Europæiske Unions charter om grundlæggende rettigheder (chartret) samt artik…
EU EU-Domstolen 2026-07-16 C-158/25 Judgment (Court of Justice)

QJ mod Administration de l'enregistrement, des domaines et de la TVA og État du Grand-duché de Luxembourg (C-158/25)

QJ mod Administration de l'enregistrement, des domaines et de la TVA og État du Grand-duché de Luxembourg
Præjudiciel forelæggelse – artikel 47 i Den Europæiske Unions charter om grundlæggende rettigheder – adgang til effektive retsmidler – anvendelse heraf – national lovgivning, der fastsætter en ordning med solidarisk hæftelse for et selskabs direktør for betaling af merværdiafgift (moms), der skyldes af dette selskab – bindende virkning af faktiske konstateringer og juridiske kvalificeringer i den endelige afgiftsansæ…
EU EU-Domstolen 2026-07-16 C-26/25 Judgment (Court of Justice)

PQ mod Országos Idegenrendészeti Főigazgatóság Dél-alföldi Regionális Igazgatóság og Alkotmányvédelmi Hivatal (C-26/25)

PQ mod Országos Idegenrendészeti Főigazgatóság Dél-alföldi Regionális Igazgatóság og Alkotmányvédelmi Hivatal
AI **Sagen** Facts: PQ, en tredjelandsstatsborger, har opholdt sig lovligt i Ungarn siden 2005 som professionel fodboldspiller. Han har siden 2011 boet sammen med sin partner, der er ungarsk statsborger, og de har sammen fået to børn med ungarsk statsborgerskab. PQ har en permanent opholdstilladelse, der er gyldig indtil den 15. september 2020. Legal question: Domstolen skal afgøre, hvordan EU-retten skal fortolkes …
EU EU-Domstolen 2026-07-16 C-666/24 Judgment (Court of Justice)

Ministerio Fiscal m.fl. mod EGB m.fl (C-666/24)

Ministerio Fiscal m.fl. mod EGB m.fl
AI **Sagens fakta** Sagen omhandler en anmodning om præjudiciel afgørelse fra Audiencia Nacional (domstol i visse straffe-, forvaltnings- og arbejdsretlige sager, Spanien) i forbindelse med en straffesag mod 12 personer, der er tiltalt for terrorhandlinger i forbindelse med bevægelsen til fordel for Cataloniens uafhængighed. **Lovlige spørgsmål** Anmodningen om præjudiciel afgørelse vedrører fortolkningen af Europa-P…
EU EU-Domstolen 2026-07-16 C-523/24 Judgment (Court of Justice)

Sociedad Civil Catalana, Asociación Cívica y Cultural (SCC) og Ministerio Fiscal mod RAS m.fl (C-523/24)

Sociedad Civil Catalana, Asociación Cívica y Cultural (SCC) og Ministerio Fiscal mod RAS m.fl
Præjudiciel forelæggelse – beskyttelse af Den Europæiske Unions finansielle interesser – artikel 325, stk. 1, TEUF – effektiv retsbeskyttelse på de områder, der er omfattet af EU-retten – artikel 19, stk. 1, andet afsnit, TEU – sag om økonomisk ansvar – bestræbelser på at opnå uafhængighed, som forfølges af et parti på en medlemsstats nationale område – national lov om amnesti for handlinger, der medfører økonomisk a…
EU EU-Domstolen 2026-07-16 C-424/24 Judgment (Court of Justice)

ZD og MI mod Federazione Italiana Giuoco Calcio (FIGC) m.fl (C-424/24)

ZD og MI mod Federazione Italiana Giuoco Calcio (FIGC) m.fl
AI **Domstolens dom (Femte Afdeling)** **Fakta** ZD og MI er to ledere af en professionel fodboldklub, Juventus Football Club SpA, som er blevet pålagt sanktioner af det italienske fodboldforbund, Federazione Italiana Giuoco Calcio (FIGC), for at have afgivet eller godkendt falske finansielle og regnskabsmæssige erklæringer. **Lovlige spørgsmål** Domstolen skal afgøre, om artikel 45 TEUF og 56 TEUF skal fortolkes så…
EU EU-Domstolen 2026-07-16 C-96/24 Judgment (Court of Justice)

X.Y. m.fl. mod Prokuratura Krajowa m.fl (C-96/24)

X.Y. m.fl. mod Prokuratura Krajowa m.fl
Præjudiciel forelæggelse – retsstat – dommeres uafhængighed – artikel 19, stk. 1, andet afsnit, TEU – artikel 47 i Den Europæiske Unions charter om grundlæggende rettigheder – national lovgivning, der gør det muligt at efterprøve overholdelsen af kravene om uafhængighed og upartiskhed for en fungerende dommer ved Sąd Najwyższy (øverste domstol, Polen) – sammensætningen af det dommerkollegium, der skal efterprøve over…
EU EU-Domstolen 2026-07-16 C-196/24 Judgment (Court of Justice)

xx mod ww m.fl (C-196/24)

xx mod ww m.fl
AI **Sagens baggrund** En italiensk ret har anmodet en fransk ret om at efterkomme en anmodning om bevisoptagelse, der består i opgravning af en formoded fars legeme og udtagning af en DNA-prøve. Anmodningen er blevet fremsendt i forbindelse med en tvist om forældreskab. **Lovlige spørgsmål** Den forelæggende ret har stillet følgende spørgsmål til EU-Domstolen: * Er artikel 12, stk. 2, i forordning 2020/1783 sammenh…
EU EU-Domstolen 2026-07-16 C-748/23 Judgment (Court of Justice)

C. Limited mod M.S (C-748/23)

C. Limited mod M.S
AI Domstolen (Fjerde Afdeling) har besluttet: 1) Artikel 19, stk. 1, andet afsnit, TEU, sammenholdt med artikel 47 i Den Europæiske Unions charter om grundlæggende rettigheder, skal fortolkes således, at omstændighederne omkring udnævnelsen af en dommer i sig selv kan medføre en tilsidesættelse af retten til en uafhængig og upartisk domstol, der forudgående er oprettet ved lov som omhandlet i disse bestemmelser, hvi…
EU EU-Domstolen 2026-07-16 C-258/23 Judgment (Court of Justice)

IMI – Imagens Médicas Integradas S.A. m.fl. mod Autoridade da Concorrência (C-258/23)

IMI – Imagens Médicas Integradas S.A. m.fl. mod Autoridade da Concorrência
AI **Domstolens beslutning** **Fakta** IMI – Imagens Médicas Integradas S.A. og andre virksomheder (C-258/23) har anmodet om præjudiciel afgørelse om fortolkningen af artikel 7 i Den Europæiske Unions charter om grundlæggende rettigheder (chartret). Anmodningerne omhandler lovligheden af foranstaltninger vedrørende ransagning og undersøgelse, indsamling og beslaglæggelse af bevismateriale i virksomhedernes lokaler i f…
EMD EMD – Chamber 2026-07-16 20092/18, 30408/18, 42807/18, 45907/18, 27314/19, 28518/19, 28521/19, 28525/19, 28528/19, 28530/19, 28532/19, 28535/19 Judgment

CASE OF BAZHENOV AND OTHERS v. RUSSIA AND UKRAINE

Russia, Ukraine
Preliminary objection partially joined to merits and dismissed (Art. 35) Admissibility criteria; (Art 35-1) Four-month period (former six-month); Struck out of the list (Art. 37) Striking out applications-{general}; (Art. 37-1) Striking out applications; (Art. 37-1-a) Absence of intention to pursue application; Remainder inadmissible (Art. 35) Admissibility criteria; (Art. 35-3-a) Ratione materiae; (Art. 35-3-a) Rati…
EMD EMD 2026-07-16 20092/18, 30408/18, 42807/18, 45907/18, 27314/19, 28518/19, 28521/19, 28525/19, 28528/19, 28530/19, 28532/19, 28535/19 Legal summary

Bazhenov and Others v. Russia and Ukraine

Russia, Ukraine
Preliminary objection partially joined to merits and dismissed (Art. 35) Admissibility criteria; (Art 35-1) Four-month period (former six-month); Struck out of the list (Art. 37) Striking out applications-{general}; (Art. 37-1) Striking out applications; (Art. 37-1-a) Absence of intention to pursue application; Remainder inadmissible (Art. 35) Admissibility criteria; (Art. 35-3-a) Ratione materiae; (Art. 35-3-a) Rati…
EMD EMD – Chamber 2026-07-16 37249/24 Judgment

CASE OF BANCA SISTEMA S.P.A. v. ITALY

Italy
Violation of Article 6 - Right to a fair trial (Article 6 - Enforcement proceedings; Article 6-1 - Access to court); Violation of Article 1 of Protocol No. 1 - Protection of property (Article 1 para. 1 of Protocol No. 1 - Peaceful enjoyment of possessions); Non-pecuniary damage - finding of violation sufficient (Article 41 - Non-pecuniary damage; Just satisfaction)
EMD EMD – Chamber 2026-07-16 63972/19, 16056/20 Judgment

CASE OF RĂDULESCU DOBROGEA AND CIUREA v. ROMANIA

Romania
Violation of Article 11 - Freedom of assembly and association (Article 11-1 - Freedom of peaceful assembly) read in the light of Article 10 - (Art. 10) Freedom of expression - {general} (Article 10-1 - Freedom of expression); Non-pecuniary damage - award (Article 41 - Non-pecuniary damage; Just satisfaction)
EMD EMD – Chamber 2026-07-16 74061/17 Judgment

CASE OF ILEANA ROȘU v. ROMANIA

Romania
Remainder inadmissible (Art. 35) Admissibility criteria; (Art 35-1) Four-month period (former six-month); (Art. 35-3-a) Manifestly ill-founded; No violation of Article 1 of Protocol No. 1 - Protection of property (Article 1 para. 1 of Protocol No. 1 - Peaceful enjoyment of possessions; Article 1 para. 2 of Protocol No. 1 - Control of the use of property)
EMD EMD – Committee 2026-07-16 16194/18 Judgment

CASE OF MĂTĂSARU v. THE REPUBLIC OF MOLDOVA

Moldova
Violation of Article 3 - Prohibition of torture (Article 3 - Degrading treatment); No violation of Article 3 - Prohibition of torture (Article 3 - Degrading treatment; Inhuman treatment); Violation of Article 14+3 - Prohibition of discrimination (Article 14 - Discrimination) (Article 3 - Prohibition of torture; Degrading treatment)
EMD EMD – Chamber 2026-07-16 28273/23 Judgment

CASE OF S.T. v. THE CZECH REPUBLIC

Czech Republic
Remainder inadmissible (Art. 35) Admissibility criteria; (Art. 35-1) Exhaustion of domestic remedies; Violation of Article 2 - Right to life (Article 2 - Positive obligations; Article 2-1 - Life; Article 2-2 - Use of force) (Substantive aspect); Violation of Article 3 - Prohibition of torture (Article 3 - Degrading treatment; Inhuman treatment) (Substantive aspect); Violation of Article 2 - Right to life (Article 2 -…
EMD EMD – Chamber 2026-07-16 7411/24 Judgment

CASE OF KARIČKOVÁ v. THE CZECH REPUBLIC

Czech Republic
Violation of Article 3 - Prohibition of torture (Article 3 - Effective investigation) (Procedural aspect); Violation of Article 14+3 - Prohibition of discrimination (Article 14 - Discrimination) (Article 3 - Prohibition of torture; Effective investigation); Non-pecuniary damage - award (Article 41 - Non-pecuniary damage; Just satisfaction)
EMD EMD – Chamber 2026-07-16 55299/20, 31515/22 Judgment

CASE OF G.K. AND A.S. v. SWITZERLAND

Switzerland
Preliminary objection dismissed (Art. 35) Admissibility criteria; (Art. 35-1) Exhaustion of domestic remedies; Violation of Article 13+9 - Right to an effective remedy (Article 13 - Effective remedy) (Article 9 - Freedom of thought, conscience and religion; Article 9-1 - Freedom of conscience; Freedom of thought); Violation of Article 9 - Freedom of thought, conscience and religion (Article 9 - Positive obligations; …
EMD EMD 2026-07-16 28273/23 Legal summary

S.T. v. the Czech Republic

Czech Republic
Remainder inadmissible (Art. 35) Admissibility criteria; (Art. 35-1) Exhaustion of domestic remedies; Violation of Article 2 - Right to life (Article 2 - Positive obligations; Article 2-1 - Life; Article 2-2 - Use of force) (Substantive aspect); Violation of Article 3 - Prohibition of torture (Article 3 - Degrading treatment; Inhuman treatment) (Substantive aspect); Violation of Article 2 - Right to life (Article 2 -…
EMD EMD 2026-07-16 55299/20, 31515/22 Legal summary

G.K. and A.S. v. Switzerland

Switzerland
Preliminary objection dismissed (Art. 35) Admissibility criteria; (Art. 35-1) Exhaustion of domestic remedies; Violation of Article 13+9 - Right to an effective remedy (Article 13 - Effective remedy) (Article 9 - Freedom of thought, conscience and religion; Article 9-1 - Freedom of conscience; Freedom of thought); Violation of Article 9 - Freedom of thought, conscience and religion (Article 9 - Positive obligations; …
EMD EMD 2026-07-13 16989/26 Communicated case

KUUR v. DENMARK

Denmark
AI 1) Fakta: Sagen omhandler en mand, Thomas Mira KUUR, der påstår, at han blev udsat for overgrep under sin arrestation den 18. juli 2024. Den 15. maj 2025 besluttede direktøren for offentliggørelse ikke at indledte straffesager mod den involverede politibetjent. Den 11. marts 2026 afviste direktøren også KUUR's anmodning om at genåbne efterforskningen efter den 19. december 2025 ved den Uafhængige Politiklagemyndighed…
EMD EMD 2026-07-13 14235/25 Communicated case

MICHAIL v. GREECE

Greece
The application concerns the decision of the domestic courts to allow the mother of the applicant’s child to christen their child in accordance with the Christian Orthodox Religion. The applicant argued before the domestic courts that the child should not be christened and should be allowed to choose his religion at a later stage. The domestic courts granted the mother’s request on the grounds that the best interests…
EMD EMD 2026-07-13 16977/26 Communicated case

HANSEN v. DENMARK

Denmark
AI **Domstolsbeslutning** 1) **Fakta**: Sagen omhandler en mand, Henrik Hansen, der blev arresteret den 26. december 2023 og blev undergennemgået en nøgenundersøgelse på politistationen, mens han var håndcuffed. Han anlagde også en klag over, at politiet havde anvendt for meget fysisk kraft under sin arrestation. Efter at sagen blev afvist af anklagemyndighederne, undersøgte Den Uafhængige Politiklagemyndighed (Den Uaf…
EMD EMD 2026-07-13 8174/23 Communicated case

ORUJOVA v. AZERBAIJAN

Azerbaijan
The application concerns the applicant’s arrest and unrecorded detention in connection with her comment on Facebook. According to the applicant, on 11 October 2021 she was arrested by several police officers while walking with her neighbour and was taken to the Organised Crime Unit of the Ministry of Internal Affairs. She submits that she was detained there for approximately three hours and questioned about a Faceboo…
EMD EMD 2026-07-13 31568/22 Communicated case

HABIBOVA v. AZERBAIJAN

Azerbaijan
The applicant’s mother was murdered in September 2010, and on an unspecified date in 2010 the criminal investigation commenced. The present application concerns the alleged ineffectiveness of the investigation into her death, as well as the alleged unlawful interference with the applicant’s private life by the prosecuting authorities.
EMD EMD 2026-07-10 6624/20 Communicated case

BAZYLEV v. UKRAINE

Ukraine
The case concerns the applicant’s conviction for attempted murder and his complaint, under Article 6 of the Convention, that the conviction was based on mere assumptions, based on shifting the burden of proving his innocence to him in breach of the principle of presumption of innocence, including the principle that all doubt must benefit the accused. The applicant also complains that the courts failed to give adequat…
EMD EMD 2026-07-10 48146/20 Communicated case

OSYCHNYUK v. UKRAINE

Ukraine
The application concerns the applicant’s complaints that his appeals cannot be examined and an attachment imposed on an apartment cannot be lifted because a case file remains in occupied territory, outside the control of the respondent State (Article 6 § 1 of the Convention and Article 1 of Protocol No. 1).
EMD EMD 2026-07-10 30756/20, 40491/20, 54231/20, 54637/21 Communicated case

POPOVICI AND OTHERS v. THE REPUBLIC OF MOLDOVA and 3 other appliations

Moldova
The cases concern the alleged effectiveness of the domestic compensatory and preventive remedies in respect of allegedly inadequate material conditions of detention. The applicants complain about an allegedly incorrect calculation of the sentence reduction granted for each day of pre‑trial detention in inadequate conditions, the inefficiency of the preventive aspect of the remedy in respect of ongoing detention and/o…
EMD EMD 2026-07-10 41094/20 Communicated case

MARTIROSYAN v. ARMENIA

Armenia
The applicant is the president of a human rights organisation advocating for the rights of the transgender community. On 5 April 2019 she participated in parliamentary hearings concerning National Human Rights Agenda within the framework of the Universal Periodic Review. She delivered a speech addressing issues of discrimination, hatred and harassment faced by transgender persons in Armenia. Following her speech, the…
EMD EMD 2026-07-10 24677/26 Communicated case

JOVANOVIC v. DENMARK

Denmark
AI Her er en sammenfatning af dommen på dansk: 1) Fakta: Sagen omfatter en statsløs mand, født i Polen i 1994, der indvandrede til Danmark med sin mor i 1997. Han har en kriminalitet og er blevet advarset om udvisning flere gange. I 2023 blev han beordret udvist med en 6-årig re-entry forbud. Efter at udvisningsordren ikke kunne gennemføres, blev han beordret til at bo på et returncenter om natten og melde sig til poli…
EMD EMD 2026-07-10 18315/26 Communicated case

ALAZEM v. DENMARK

Denmark
AI **Domstolsbeslutning:** 1. **Fakta:** Sagen omhandler en 20-årig syrisk mand, Rafiq Alazem, der blev dømt for vold med forstærkende omstændigheder og fik en udvisningsordre med en 6-årig re-entry forbud. Han klager over, at udvisningsordren er i strid med artikel 8 om respekt for privatliv og familie. 2. **Retlige spørgsmål:** Er udvisningsordren med et 6-årig re-entry forbud i strid med artikel 8 af Den Europæiske…
EMD EMD 2026-07-10 17821/26 Communicated case

MOHSENI v. DENMARK

Denmark
AI **Facts** Sagen omhandler en afghansk statsborger, Moein MOHSENI, født i 2007, som indvandrede til Danmark i 2009 som 2-årig. Han blev dømt for overfald og narkotikabeslutning og fik en fængselsstraf på 1 år og 6 måneder samt en udvisningsordre med en 4-årig re-entry forbud. **Lovlig spørgsmål** Spørgsmålet er, om udvisningsordren med et 4-årigt re-entry forbud er i strid med artikel 8 om ytringsfrihed i Den Europ…
EU EU-Domstolen 2026-07-09 C-186/25 Judgment (Court of Justice)

Institut po ribni resursi Varna mod Rakovoditel na Natsionalnia organ po Savmestna operativna programa za transgranichno satrudnichestvo »Chernomorski baseyn 2014-2020« i direktor na direktsia »Upravlenie na teritorialnoto satrudnichestvo« (C-186/25)

Institut po ribni resursi Varna mod Rakovoditel na Natsionalnia organ po Savmestna operativna programa za transgranichno satrudnichestvo »Chernomorski baseyn 2014-2020« i direktor na direktsia »Upravl
AI **Domstolens afgørelse** **Sag:** C-186/25 **Fakta:** Institut po ribni resursi Varna (instituttet for fiskeressourcer, Varna) har anlagt en sag mod Rakovoditel na Natsionalnia organ po Savmestna operativna programa za transgranichno satrudnichestvo »Chernomorski basein 2014-2020« (den nationale myndighed) og direktor na direktsia »Upravlenie na teritorialnoto satrudnichestvo« (direktøren for ledelsen af territoria…
EU EU-Domstolen 2026-07-09 C-199/24 Judgment (Court of Justice)

ND mod Legal Newsdesk Sweden AB, anciennement Garrapatica AB (C-199/24)

ND mod Legal Newsdesk Sweden AB, anciennement Garrapatica AB
Præjudiciel forelæggelse – beskyttelse af fysiske personer i forbindelse med behandling af personoplysninger – forordning (EU) 2016/679 – anvendelsesområde – tilgængeliggørelse for offentligheden online og mod betaling af oplysninger om straffedomme – forening af retten til beskyttelse af personoplysninger med retten til ytrings- og informationsfrihed – artikel 79 – ret til effektive retsmidler – rækkevidde – artikel…
EU EU-Domstolen 2026-07-09 C-428/23 Judgment (Court of Justice)

ROGON GmbH & Co. KG m.fl. mod Deutscher Fußballbund eV (DFB) (C-428/23)

ROGON GmbH & Co. KG m.fl. mod Deutscher Fußballbund eV (DFB)
AI **Domstolens dom (Femte Afdeling)** **Facts** ROGON GmbH & Co. KG, MVI Management GmbH og DC har anlagt sag mod Deutscher Fußball-Bund eV (DFB) om lovligheden af DFB's regelsæt om spilleragentvirksomhed. Regelsættet regulerer anvendelsen af tjenesteydelser fra tredjepartsvirksomheder, som ikke tilhører DFB. **Legal question** Domstolen skal afgøre, om artikel 101, stk. 1, TEUF skal fortolkes således, at den undta…
EMD EMD 2026-07-09 7123/23 Communicated case

M.Z. AND D.Z. v. RUSSIA AND UKRAINE

Russia
The application arises from the full-scale invasion of Ukraine by the Russian Federation that began on 24 February 2022. It concerns the rape and other forms of violence allegedly inflicted upon the first applicant and the alleged unlawful killing of her husband by Russian forces in their home in the Kyiv region on 9 March 2022 (see, for the context, Ukraine and the Netherlands v. Russia [GC], nos. 8019/16 and 3 othe…
EMD EMD – Committee 2026-07-09 20332/17, 22284/17, 71278/17, 77394/17, 84281/17, 17806/18, 19594/18, 27175/18, 42939/18, 10296/19, 44685/19, 50507/19 Judgment

CASE OF CHERTOK AND OTHERS v. RUSSIA

Russia
Violation of Article 3 - Prohibition of torture (Article 3 - Degrading treatment) (Substantive aspect); Violation of Article 3 - Prohibition of torture (Article 3 - Degrading treatment) (Substantive aspect); Violation of Article 3 - Prohibition of torture (Article 3 - Degrading treatment) (Substantive aspect)
EMD EMD – Chamber 2026-07-09 31582/20 Judgment

CASE OF BARSUK AND GYL v. UKRAINE

Ukraine
Violation of Article 14+3 - Prohibition of discrimination (Article 14 - Discrimination) (Article 3 - Prohibition of torture; Effective investigation); Violation of Article 14+9 - Prohibition of discrimination (Article 14 - Discrimination) (Article 9 - Freedom of thought, conscience and religion; Positive obligations; Article 9-1 - Freedom of religion; Manifest religion or belief); Pecuniary damage - claim dismissed (…
EMD EMD – Grand Chamber 2026-07-09 48047/15, 2276/20 Judgment

CASE OF JESUS PINHAL v. PORTUGAL

Portugal
No violation of Article 4 of Protocol No. 7 - Right not to be tried or punished twice - {general} (Article 4 of Protocol No. 7 - Right not to be tried or punished twice) Separate opinion(s) attached. Key case.
EMD EMD 2026-07-08 16831/24, 12781/25 Communicated case

TEN HOEVE v. SWEDEN and 1 other application

Sweden
The applications concern the accessibility and possible disclosure of the applicant’s personal data in the state personal address register (statens personadressregister, SPAR) and the taxation database (beskattningsdatabasen), administrated by the Swedish Tax Agency (Skatteverket), and in the companies register (aktiebolagsregistret) and the trade register (handelsregistret), administrated by the Swedish Companies Re…