DDB
Retten i Kolding
2026-09-08
SS-118/2026-KOL
Dom
Anklagemyndigheden
Tiltalte idømt 6 års fængsel for vold
under særdeles skærpende omstænd...
Dom afsagt: 8. september 2026
En 47-årig mand blev straffet med fængsel i 6 år for vold under særdeles skærpende omstændigheder mod en handicappet kvinde i forbindelse med, at hun afgik ved døden
Dom afsagt af Retten i Kolding den 8. september 2026 under straffesagsnr. 118/2026.
Sagen kort fortalt
Tiltalte, en 47-årig mand fra By 1, var tilt…
DDB
Højesteret
2026-09-08
BS-53040/2025-HJR
Dom
Skatte- og Vækstministeriet
AI Denne dom handler om en sag mellem Appelindstævnte, tidligere Sagsøger og Skatte- og Vækstministeriet. Dommen handler om, om Appelindstævnte, tidligere Sagsøger skal betale skat på beløb, der blev overført til ham fra Virksomhed ApS 1, men senere blev erklæret ugyldige og tilbagebetalt.
Højesteret finder, at da beløbene blev erklæret ugyldige og tilbagebetalt, betyder det, at Appelindstævnte, tidligere Sagsøger ikke…
EMD
EMD
2026-09-07
33480/24
Communicated case
Türkiye
The application concerns the domestic courts’ refusal to grant the applicant custody of her children in the context of divorce proceedings on the basis of her alleged links with a terrorist organisation.
EMD
EMD
2026-09-07
43792/21, 49730/21, 10865/22, 12184/22, 12188/22, 16856/22, 29175/22, 17466/24, 19170/24, 19457/24, 11384/25
Communicated case
Türkiye
The applications concern disciplinary sanctions imposed on the applicants (for details regarding the nature of and reasons given for the sanctions, see the Appendix), civil servants at the material time, on account of their participation in certain public assemblies, such as marches and demonstrations, and/or making press statements and chanting slogans during these assemblies.
EMD
EMD
2026-09-07
7829/23
Communicated case
Poland
The application concerns various sets of proceedings aimed at the expulsion of the applicant (a lawfully resident alien) on the grounds of national security.
EMD
EMD
2026-09-07
10844/26
Communicated case
Türkiye
The applicant is an Uzbek national who left Uzbekistan and entered Türkiye lawfully in 2014, alleging pressure and surveillance by Uzbek authorities due to his individual religious practices. In 2022 criminal proceedings were brought against him in Türkiye for alleged membership of a terrorist organisation; however, he was acquitted of all charges by the Istanbul 29th Assize Court.
EMD
EMD
2026-09-07
23096/25, 26443/25, 26476/25, 26573/25, 26586/25, 26668/25, 27166/25, 32596/25, 34544/25
Communicated case
Türkiye
The applications concern the alleged unfairness of criminal proceedings against several members of the Turkish Armed Forces (“the TAF”), holding various ranks, in connection with their alleged involvement in the attempted coup on the night of 15 July 2016, on account of their deployment to and acts carried out at the Ankara 4th Main Jet Base Command (“the Akıncı base”). According to the domestic courts, the events fo…
EMD
EMD
2026-09-07
34092/24, 9044/25, 10887/25
Communicated case
Netherlands
The applications concern the applicants’ pre-placement detention in ordinary prisons pending their transfer to a suitable institution under an order for placement at the disposal of the Government with confinement in a custodial clinic (terbeschikkingstelling met bevel tot verpleging van overheidswege - “TBS”). Time-expired convict prisoners awaiting transfer to a suitable institution under a TBS order are colloquial…
EMD
EMD
2026-09-07
10866/24
Communicated case
Hungary
The application concerns criminal proceedings in which the applicant was found guilty of, among other things, espionage against the institutions of the European Union under Article 261/A of the Criminal Code.
EMD
EMD
2026-09-07
26822/25
Communicated case
Serbia
The application primarily concerns alleged shortcomings in the investigation into the circumstances surrounding the death of the applicants’ son.
DDB
Grønlands landsret
2026-09-07
SS-04598/2026-GLR
Dom
Anklagemyndigheden
HR
Højesteret
2026-09-04
37257/2025
Dom/kendelse
Nykredit Bank A/S (tidligere Spar Nord Bank A/S) mod Skatte- og Vækstministeriet
AI Højesteret har afgjort en sag om skatteregler for aktieerhvervelser og optionspræmier. Dommen fastholder landsrettens dom og afgør, at aktierne skal anses som næringsaktier, og at optionspræmierne skal beskattes efter aktieavancebeskatningslovens regler eller statsskattelovens § 4, afhængigt af om der sker udnyttelse af optionen.
Dommen afgør også, at præmiebetalingerne for de optioner, der ikke blev udnyttet, skal …
HR
Højesteret
2026-09-04
36904/2025
Dom/kendelse
Sydjysk Sparekasse (tidligere Broager Sparekasse) mod Skatte- og Vækstministeriet
AI Højesteret har behandlet en sag om Sydjysk Sparekasse og dens aktieerhvervelser i 2014 og 2017. Højesteret har konkluderet, at aktieerhvervelserne ikke kun var til anlæg, men også med henblik på at opnå gevinst ved videresalg. Derfor skal aktierne anses som næringsaktier.
Højesteret har også behandlet spørgsmålet om, hvordan årlige optionspræmier skal behandles skattemæssigt. Højesteret har konkluderet, at præmiebet…
DDB
Højesteret
2026-09-04
BS-36904/2025-HJR
Dom
Sydjysk Sparekasse (tidligere Broager Sparekasse) · Skatte- og Vækstministeriet
AI Højesteret har afgjort en sag om skattemæssig behandling af aktieerhvervelser og optionspræmier. Sydjysk Sparekasse (tidligere Broager Sparekasse) havde erhvervet aktier i DLR Kredit, og de sælgende pengeinstitutter havde fået en call-option til at tilbagekøbe aktierne. Sparekassen ønskede at videresælge aktierne og opnå gevinst, og Højesteret fandt, at aktierne skulle anses som næringsaktier.
Højesteret besluttede …
DDB
Østre Landsret
2026-09-04
SS-2565/2024-OLR
Dom
Anklagemyndigheden
DDB
Højesteret
2026-09-04
BS-37257/2025-HJR
Dom
Skatte- og Vækstministeriet · Nykredit Bank A/S
AI Denne dom handler om en skatteafgiftssag mellem Nykredit Bank og Skatte- og Vækstministeriet. Nykredit Bank havde købt aktier i DLR Kredit, og der var en aftale om, at aktierne skulle tilbagekøbes, hvis Nykredit Bank ikke ønskede at beholde dem. Der var også en aftale om, at Nykredit Bank skulle betale en optionspræmie til de pengeinstitutter, der havde solgt aktierne til Nykredit Bank.
Højesteret fastslog, at aktie…
EU
EU-Domstolen
2026-09-03
C-147/25
Judgment (Court of Justice)
»Inter Rao Lietuva« AB mod Finansinių nusikaltimų tyrimo tarnyba prie Lietuvos Respublikos vidaus reikalų ministerijos
AI **Sagen**
Facts:
* Inter Rao Lietuva AB er et litauisk selskab, der er blevet pålagt en indefrysning af pengemidler og økonomiske ressourcer af Finansinių nusikaltimų tyrimo tarnyba prie Lietuvos Respublikos vidaus reikalų ministerijos (FNTT) på grund af forbindelse til præsidenten for Den Russiske Føderation.
* Sagen omhandler fortolkningen af artikel 2, stk. 1, i Rådets afgørelse 2014/145/FUSP og artikel 2, stk. …
EU
EU-Domstolen
2026-09-03
C-60/25
Judgment (Court of Justice)
SR mod FT SpA
Præjudiciel forelæggelse – konkurrence – karteller – artikel 101, stk. 2, TEUF – aftaler, der er forbudt i medfør af artikel 101 TEUF, er ugyldige uden videre – forordning (EF) nr. 1/2003 – artikel 16, stk. 1 – afgørelser fra Europa-Kommissionen, hvorved der fastslås en overtrædelse af artikel 101 TEUF – disse afgørelsers bindende virkning for en national ret – samlet og vedvarende overtrædelse i sektoren for rentede…
EU
EU-Domstolen
2026-09-03
C-509/25
AG opinion
EU
EU-Domstolen
2026-09-03
C-394/25
AG opinion
EU
EU-Domstolen
2026-09-03
C-478/25
AG opinion
EU
EU-Domstolen
2026-09-03
C-392/25
AG opinion
EU
EU-Domstolen
2026-09-03
C-393/25
AG opinion
EU
EU-Domstolen
2026-09-03
C-371/25
AG opinion
EU
EU-Domstolen
2026-09-03
C-380/25
AG opinion
EU
EU-Domstolen
2026-09-03
C-320/25
AG opinion
EU
EU-Domstolen
2026-09-03
C-345/25
AG opinion
EU
EU-Domstolen
2026-09-03
C-235/25
AG opinion
EU
EU-Domstolen
2026-09-03
C-285/25
AG opinion
EU
EU-Domstolen
2026-09-03
C-218/25
AG opinion
EU
EU-Domstolen
2026-09-03
C-228/25
AG opinion
EU
EU-Domstolen
2026-09-03
C-798/24
Judgment (Court of Justice)
A m.fl
Præjudiciel forelæggelse – beskyttelse af fysiske personer i forbindelse med behandling af personoplysninger – forordning (EU) 2016/679 – artikel 5 – principper for behandling af personoplysninger – artikel 6 – lovlig behandling – selskabsret – direktiv (EU) 2017/1132 – artikel 14 – dokumenter og oplysninger, der skal offentliggøres – begrebet »personer, der deltager i ledelsen af, i tilsynet med eller i kontrollen m…
EU
EU-Domstolen
2026-09-03
C-193/25
AG opinion
EU
EU-Domstolen
2026-09-03
C-653/24
Judgment (Court of Justice)
Presidente del Consiglio dei Ministri mod Regione Emilia-Romagna
Præjudiciel forelæggelse – tjenesteydelser på det indre marked – direktiv 2006/123/EF – artikel 2, stk. 1 – anvendelsesområde – artikel 4, nr. 1) – begrebet »tjenesteydelse« – udvælgelse af ansøgere – artikel 12, stk. 1 og 2 – koncession på små vandafledninger med henblik på produktion af hydroelektricitet og tilsvarende anlæg til produktion af energi – national lovgivning, der foreskriver automatisk fornyelse af til…
EU
EU-Domstolen
2026-09-03
C-606/24
Judgment (Court of Justice)
XY m.fl. mod Ministerul Finanţelor
AI **Sagens fakta**
Sagen omhandler en tvist mellem flere fysiske personer og Ministerul Finanţelor (finansministeriet) i Rumænien vedrørende genberegning og udbetaling af lønkrav som personale, der aflønnes med offentlige midler.
**Lovlige spørgsmål**
Anmodningen om præjudiciel afgørelse vedrører fortolkningen af artikel 2 TEU og artikel 19, stk. 1, andet afsnit, TEU samt af artikel 47 i Den Europæiske Unions charte…
EU
EU-Domstolen
2026-09-03
C-598/24
Judgment (Court of Justice)
CY mod Gândul Media Network SRL og HO
Præjudiciel forelæggelse – tilnærmelse af lovgivningerne – direktiv 2001/29/EF – harmonisering af visse aspekter af ophavsret og beslægtede rettigheder i informationssamfundet – retten til reproduktion – artikel 2, litra a) – begrebet »værk« – kort tekst, der er delt på et socialt netværk og gengivet i onlinepressen – artikel 5 – undtagelser og indskrænkninger – artikel 5, stk. 3, litra c) – redegørelser for dagsbegi…
EU
EU-Domstolen
2026-09-03
C-499/24 P
Judgment (Court of Justice)
Ereğli Demir ve Çelik Fabrikaları TAŞ m.fl. mod Europa-Kommissionen
Appel – dumping – gennemførelsesforordning (EU) 2021/1100 – import af visse varmvalsede flade produkter af jern og ulegeret stål eller andre former for legeret stål med oprindelse i Tyrkiet – endelig antidumpingtold – beregning af den normale værdi – rimelig sammenligning – forordning (EU) 2016/1036 – artikel 2, stk. 5 – artikel 2, stk. 10, litra j) – justeringer – valutaomregning – risikoafdækningsgevinster og ‑tab …
EU
EU-Domstolen
2026-09-03
C-498/24 P
Judgment (Court of Justice)
Çolakoğlu Metalurji AŞ og Çolakoğlu Dış Ticaret AŞ mod Europa-Kommissionen
Appel – dumping – gennemførelsesforordning (EU) 2021/1100 – import af visse varmvalsede flade produkter af jern og ulegeret stål eller andre former for legeret stål med oprindelse i Tyrkiet – endelig antidumpingtold – forordning (EU) 2016/1036 – rimelig sammenligning mellem eksportprisen og den normale værdi – justeringer – artikel 2, stk. 10, litra i) – provision – opgaver, som kan sidestilles med de opgaver, der va…
EU
EU-Domstolen
2026-09-03
C-319/24 P
Judgment (Court of Justice)
Europa-Kommissionen mod Sinopec Chongqing SVW Chemical Co. Ltd m.fl
Appel – dumping – gennemførelsesforordning (EU) 2020/1336 – import af visse former for polyvinylalkohol med oprindelse i Folkerepublikken Kina – endelig antidumpingtold – forordning (EU) 2016/1036 – artikel 2, stk. 6a – beregning af den normale værdi på grund af væsentlige fordrejninger i det eksporterende land – artikel 2, stk. 10 – rimelig sammenligning mellem eksportprisen og den normale værdi i samme handelsled –…
EU
EU-Domstolen
2026-09-03
C-145/24 P
Judgment (Court of Justice)
BdM Banca SpA mod Europa-Kommissionen
Appel – statsstøtte – støtte ydet af nationale myndigheder til en bank – Kommissionens afgørelse, hvorved foranstaltningen blev erklæret for statsstøtte, der er uforenelig med det indre marked – denne afgørelses ulovlighed – erstatningssøgsmål – artikel 340, stk. 2, TEUF – forældelsesfrist – EU-retlig bestemmelse, som har til formål at tillægge borgerne rettigheder – tilstrækkeligt kvalificeret tilsidesættelse – årsa…
EU
EU-Domstolen
2026-09-03
C-661/24
AG opinion
DDB
Grønlands landsret
2026-09-03
SS-12689/2026-GLR
Dom
Anklagemyndigheden
DDB
Grønlands landsret
2026-09-03
SS-13998/2026-GLR
Dom
Anklagemyndigheden
DDB
Retten i Grønland
2026-09-03
BS-16203/2025-RIG
Dom
EMD
EMD
2026-09-03
47346/22, 17898/24, 20359/24, 27218/24, 27883/24, 28187/24, 29867/24, 31098/24, 32161/24, 33090/24, 33258/24, 33613/24, 34050/24, 34116/24, 36433/24, 37227/24, 657/25
Communicated case
Russia
Following a preliminary examination of the admissibility of the applications on 3 September 2026, the Court decided, under Rule 54 § 2 (b) of the Rules of Court, that notice of the applications should be given to the Government of Russia. It is to be noted that the issue of jurisdiction over the area where the incidents giving rise to the complaints allegedly took place has been examined and decided by the Grand Cham…
EMD
EMD
2026-09-03
69644/17, 47441/19, 20296/20, 57465/21, 36341/22
Communicated case
Russia
Following a preliminary examination of the admissibility of the applications on 3 September 2026, the Court decided, under Rule 54 § 2 (b) of the Rules of Court, that notice of the applications should be given to the Government of Russia.
EMD
EMD
2026-09-03
40921/22, 47418/22, 20889/24, 25881/24, 26657/24, 27462/24, 27797/24, 28261/24, 29768/24, 29902/24, 31449/24, 31520/24, 31537/24, 31559/24, 31931/24, 31959/24, 32134/24, 32539/24, 32544/24, 33678/24, 36935/24, 37035/24, 37102/24, 37139/24, 37563/24, 37577/24, 37717/24, 2574/25
Communicated case
Russia
Following a preliminary examination of the admissibility of the applications on 3 September 2026, the Court decided, under Rule 54 § 2 (b) of the Rules of Court, that notice of the applications should be given to the Government of Russia. It is to be noted that the issue of jurisdiction over the area where the incidents giving rise to the complaints allegedly took place has been examined and decided by the Grand Cham…
EMD
EMD
2026-09-03
21688/18, 19186/21, 19194/21, 19196/21, 38816/21, 48198/21, 28547/22
Communicated case
Russia
Following a preliminary examination of the admissibility of the applications on 3 September 2026, the Court decided, under Rule 54 § 2 (b) of the Rules of Court, that notice of the applications should be given to the Government of Russia.
EMD
EMD
2026-09-03
25564/24, 27695/24, 28821/24, 31328/24, 33340/24, 35005/24, 35164/24, 1481/25
Communicated case
Russia
Following a preliminary examination of the admissibility of the applications on 3 September 2026, the Court decided, under Rule 54 § 2 (b) of the Rules of Court, that notice of the applications should be given to the Government of Russia. It is to be noted that the issue of jurisdiction over the area where the incidents giving rise to the complaints allegedly took place has been examined and decided by the Grand Cham…
EMD
EMD
2026-09-03
49943/22
Communicated case
Russia
The application concerns restrictions imposed by the Russian authorities on the applicant’s freedom of movement, following the Russian Federation’s assertion of jurisdiction over Crimea (see Ukraine v. Russia (re Crimea) (dec.) [GC], nos. 20958/14 and 38334/18, § 335, 16 December 2020).
EMD
EMD
2026-09-03
15995/18, 38686/22
Communicated case
Russia
Following a preliminary examination of the admissibility of the applications on 3 September 2026, the Court decided, under Rule 54 § 2 (b) of the Rules of Court, that notice of the applications should be given to the Government of Russia.
EMD
EMD
2026-09-03
23503/19
Communicated case
Russia
The application concerns restrictions imposed by the Russian authorities on the applicant’s right to leave Crimea following the Russian Federation’s assertion of jurisdiction over the peninsula (see Ukraine v. Russia (re Crimea) (dec.) [GC], nos. 20958/14 and 38334/18, § 335, 16 December 2020).
EMD
EMD
2026-09-03
26840/26
Communicated case
Denmark
AI 1) Fakta:
Hafed Matoussi, en tunesiske national født i Danmark i 1991, havde en kriminalitet og blev i 2018 pålagt udvisning med en varig re-indsættelsesforbud. Efter flere forlængelser af udvisningsordren blev Matoussi pålagt at bo på Kærshovedgård return center om natten og mellem dagsregisteringen på centeret og politiet. Han indledte en civil sag mod Return Agency, men fik ikke ret i første instans eller på appel…
EMD
EMD
2026-09-03
4489/26
Communicated case
Malta
The application concerns the applicant’s separation from her son. The applicant (mother) is undergoing separation proceedings before the Family Court and originally had care and custody of the couple’s child, K. The Child Protection Directorate (AA) was monitoring the situation as of 2019 as K was reluctant to see his father for supervised visits. However, on 18 July 2022 AA submitted that they should step aside from…
EMD
EMD
2026-09-03
41508/22
Communicated case
Albania
1. The applicant, Ms Elizabeta Imeraj, is an Albanian national, who was born in 1979 and lives in Tirana. She is represented before the Court by Mr G. Thuan Dit Dieudonné, a lawyer practising in Strasbourg, as well as by Mr S. Stavros and Mr T. Dalacouras, lawyers practising in Athens, Strasbourg and Rodopi, Greece.
EMD
EMD – Committee
2026-09-03
35845/24
Judgment
Armenia
Violation of Article 8 - Right to respect for private and family life (Article 8 - Positive obligations; Article 8-1 - Respect for family life)
EMD
EMD – Committee
2026-09-03
5442/15
Judgment
Armenia
Violation of Article 2 - Right to life (Article 2-1 - Effective investigation) (Procedural aspect)
EMD
EMD – Committee
2026-09-03
53846/16
Judgment
Armenia
Violation of Article 11 - Freedom of assembly and association (Article 11-1 - Freedom of peaceful assembly)
EMD
EMD – Committee
2026-09-03
5837/17
Judgment
Armenia
Violation of Article 6 - Right to a fair trial (Article 6 - Civil proceedings; Article 6-1 - Access to court)
EMD
EMD – Committee
2026-09-03
6818/23
Judgment
Armenia
Violation of Article 8 - Right to respect for private and family life (Article 8 - Positive obligations; Article 8-1 - Respect for family life)
EMD
EMD
2026-09-03
33087/17
Decision
Moldova
EMD
EMD
2026-09-03
24201/17
Decision
Ukraine
EMD
EMD
2026-09-03
8195/22
Decision
Poland
EMD
EMD
2026-09-03
14878/24
Decision
Poland
EMD
EMD
2026-09-03
11663/25
Decision
Netherlands
EMD
EMD
2026-09-03
64519/16
Decision
Poland
EMD
EMD
2026-09-03
4841/17
Decision
Ukraine
EMD
EMD
2026-09-03
40455/18
Decision
Ukraine
EMD
EMD
2026-09-03
52930/20
Decision
Serbia
EMD
EMD
2026-09-03
13287/25
Decision
Montenegro
EMD
EMD
2026-09-03
32183/24
Decision
Netherlands
EMD
EMD
2026-09-03
25750/24, 34006/24, 2295/25
Decision
Poland
EMD
EMD
2026-09-03
21139/23
Decision
North Macedonia
EMD
EMD
2026-09-03
1742/26
Decision
Italy
EMD
EMD
2026-09-03
32408/24
Decision
Poland
EMD
EMD
2026-09-03
32944/25, 35050/25, 36533/25, 37050/25, 37636/25, 38596/25, 39369/25, 3319/26, 5909/26
Decision
Hungary
EMD
EMD
2026-09-03
38083/07
Decision
Italy
EMD
EMD
2026-09-03
26233/18
Decision
North Macedonia
EMD
EMD
2026-09-03
27821/25, 36456/25, 39032/25, 1273/26, 1959/26, 1997/26, 2320/26, 4492/26, 4723/26, 4772/26
Decision
Hungary
EMD
EMD
2026-09-03
27960/25
Decision
Hungary
EMD
EMD
2026-09-03
16030/23
Decision
Lithuania
EMD
EMD
2026-09-03
19484/24
Decision
Croatia
EMD
EMD
2026-09-03
12845/21, 42427/21, 44166/21
Decision
Greece
EMD
EMD – Chamber
2026-09-03
52315/22
Judgment
France
No violation of Article 11 - Freedom of assembly and association (Article 11-1 - Freedom of peaceful assembly)
EMD
EMD
2026-09-03
49458/20
Decision
Azerbaijan
EMD
EMD – Chamber
2026-09-03
9327/23
Judgment
Latvia
Preliminary objection joined to merits and dismissed (Article 35-3-a - Ratione materiae); No violation of Article 4 - Prohibition of slavery and forced labour (Article 4 - Positive obligations; Effective investigation; Article 4-1 - Servitude; Article 4-2 - Forced labour)
EMD
EMD – Committee
2026-09-03
1007/20, 21022/21
Judgment
Switzerland
Violation of Article 8 - Right to respect for private and family life (Article 8-1 - Respect for private life)
EMD
EMD – Chamber
2026-09-03
23169/16, 23834/18, 37683/19, 17937/20
Judgment
Italy
Preliminary objection joined to merits and dismissed (Art. 34) Individual applications; (Art. 34) Victim; Violation of Article 3 - Prohibition of torture (Article 3 - Degrading punishment; Inhuman punishment) (Substantive aspect); No violation of Article 3 - Prohibition of torture (Article 3 - Degrading punishment; Inhuman punishment) (Substantive aspect); Violation of Article 3 - Prohibition of torture (Article 3 - …
EMD
EMD – Chamber
2026-09-03
13598/21
Judgment
France
No violation of Article 1 of Protocol No. 1 - Protection of property (Article 1 para. 2 of Protocol No. 1 - Control of the use of property)
EMD
EMD – Committee
2026-09-03
61435/21
Judgment
Spain
Violation of Article 11 - Freedom of assembly and association (Article 11-1 - Freedom of peaceful assembly) read in the light of Article 10 - (Art. 10) Freedom of expression - {general} (Article 10-1 - Freedom of expression)
EMD
EMD – Committee
2026-09-03
47190/16
Judgment
Poland
Violation of Article 6 - Right to a fair trial (Article 6 - Civil proceedings; Article 6-1 - Access to court)
EMD
EMD – Committee
2026-09-03
20068/21
Judgment
Ukraine
Violation of Article 3 - Prohibition of torture (Article 3 - Degrading treatment) (Substantive aspect); Violation of Article 13+13 - Right to an effective remedy (Article 13 - Effective remedy) (Article 13 - Right to an effective remedy; Effective remedy); Violation of Article 34 - Individual applications (Article 34 - Hinder the exercise of the right of application)
EMD
EMD – Committee
2026-09-03
42909/23
Judgment
Italy
Violation of Article 5 - Right to liberty and security (Article 5-1 - Lawful arrest or detention; Article 5-1-f - Expulsion; Prevent unauthorised entry into country); Violation of Article 5 - Right to liberty and security (Article 5-2 - Information on reasons for arrest); Violation of Article 5 - Right to liberty and security (Article 5-4 - Speediness of review)
EMD
EMD – Committee
2026-09-03
35931/19
Judgment
Ukraine
Violation of Article 6 - Right to a fair trial (Article 6 - Civil proceedings; Article 6-1 - Access to court)
EMD
EMD – Committee
2026-09-03
17271/21
Judgment
Poland
Violation of Article 6 - Right to a fair trial (Article 6 - Civil proceedings; Article 6-1 - Access to court)
EMD
EMD – Committee
2026-09-03
47789/18
Judgment
Ukraine
Violation of Article 1 of Protocol No. 1 - Protection of property (Article 1 para. 2 of Protocol No. 1 - Control of the use of property)
DDB
Grønlands landsret
2026-09-02
SS-15560/2026-GLR
Dom
Anklagemyndigheden
DDB
Grønlands landsret
2026-09-02
SS-12696/2026-GLR
Dom
Anklagemyndigheden
EMD
EMD
2026-09-02
51856/20
Communicated case
Ukraine
The case concerns the placement, in 2017, of the applicant’s son (a life prisoner) in a prison located far from his family and repeated rejections of the applicant’s and her son’s requests for his transfer to a closer prison. Although the domestic courts cancelled one of such rejections and obliged the Ministry of Justice’s authorities to repeatedly examine the transfer request, that decision has apparently remained …
EMD
EMD
2026-09-02
29587/24
Communicated case
Sweden
The application concerns restrictions on the applicant’s contact with her children and the proceedings related to those restrictions.