⚖️ RKLAW
Log in

Decisions 1797 found

All Domsdatabasen · 610 Højesteret · 144 HUDOC (EMD) · 565 EUR-Lex (CJEU) · 478
Results load automatically as you scroll
EMD EMD 2026-09-02 1663/17, 1722/17 Communicated case

ANTONENKO v. RUSSIA and 1 other application

Russia
The applications concern alleged restrictions on the applicants’ right to freedom of movement between Crimea and mainland Ukraine, resulting from the Russian Federation’s de facto transformation of the administrative boundary line into a state border following its assertion of jurisdiction over Crimea (see Ukraine v. Russia (re Crimea) [GC], nos. 20958/14 and 38334/18, § 1175, 25 June 2024).
EMD EMD 2026-09-02 41145/15, 32554/17, 2111/18, 24490/18, 41466/22 Communicated case

KADYROV v. RUSSIA and 4 other applications

Russia
The applications arise from the conflict between Ukraine and the Russian Federation, following the latter’s assertion of jurisdiction over Crimea as of 27 February 2014 (see Ukraine v. Russia (re Crimea) (dec.) [GC], nos. 20958/14 and 38334/18, § 335, 16 December 2020). They primarily concern administrative expulsion orders and other restrictions imposed on the applicants by the Russian authorities in Crimea.
EMD EMD 2026-09-02 44766/22, 31966/25 Communicated case

PIETRUSZYŃSKI v. POLAND and 1 other application

Poland
The applicants are judges of the Criminal Chamber of the Supreme Court of Poland. The applications concern the criminal investigation into the applicants’ alleged wrongdoings within their judicial duties and the proceedings aimed at lifting their judicial immunity. The case raises issues under Articles 6, 8, 10 and 18 of the Convention.
DDB Retten i Hillerød 2026-09-01 SS-608/2023-HIL Dom

Sag om hvidvask af særlig grov beskaffenhed

Anklagemyndigheden
Dom i sag om hvidvask af særlig grov beskaffenhed. Dom afsagt: 1. september 2026 Retten i Hillerød har den 1. september 2026 afsagt dom i en sag om hvidvask af særlig grov beskaffenhed. Fem mænd i alderen fra 30 til 43 år blev idømt fængselsstraffe på mellem 2½ år og 6 år for deres rolle i sagen. Sagsnummer: SS-608/2023 Sagen kort fortalt De fem mænd blev fundet skyldige navnlig i hvidvask af særlig grov beskaffe…
DDB Retten i Esbjerg 2026-09-01 SS-70/2026-ESB Dom

Tiltale for bl.a. overtrædelse af straffelovens § 246, jf. § 245, stk. 1, jf. § 247, stk. 1 - legemsangreb af særlig rå, brutal eller farlig karakter, under særdeles skærpende omstændigheder og straffelovens § 250 - hensættelse i hjælpeløs tilstand

Anklagemyndigheden
44-årig mand idømt 8 års fængsel for vold med døden til følge Dom afsagt: 1. september 2026 Et enigt nævningeting ved Retten i Esbjerg har fundet en 44-årig mand skyldig i at have udsat en 56-årig mand fra Esbjerg for vold med døden til følge. Dom afsagt den 1. september 2026 Rettens sagsnummer 99-70/2026 Sagen kort fortalt Et enigt nævningeting ved Retten i Esbjerg har fundet en 44-årig mand skyldig i at have u…
EMD EMD 2026-09-01 39891/17, 45557/19, 22612/20 Communicated case

KHOMENOK v. RUSSIA and 2 other application

Russia
The applications arise from the conflict between Ukraine and the Russian Federation, following the latter’s assertion of jurisdiction over Crimea as of 27 February 2014 (see Ukraine v. Russia (re Crimea) (dec.) [GC], nos. 20958/14 and 38334/18, § 335, 16 December 2020). They primarily concern restrictions imposed on the applicants, who are journalists, from entering Crimea for periods of five or ten years on national…
EMD EMD 2026-09-01 4484/15, 30263/16, 55909/19, 36498/20, 11787/21 Communicated case

CHUBAROV v. RUSSIA qnd 4 other qpplicqtions

Russia
The applications arise from the conflict between Ukraine and the Russian Federation, following the latter’s assertion of jurisdiction over Crimea as of 27 February 2014 (see Ukraine v. Russia (re Crimea) (dec.) [GC], nos. 20958/14 and 38334/18, § 335, 16 December 2020). They primarily concern entry bans imposed on the applicants by the Russian authorities in relation to Crimea. The applicants, most of whom are of Cri…
EMD EMD 2026-09-01 14146/26 Communicated case

NICOLAOU v. CYPRUS

Cyprus
The applicant was a police officer. He was prosecuted for, inter alia, conspiracy to commit a felony and drug possession (criminal case no. 15956/08). The Assize Court dismissed the case on account of the prosecution’s failure to establish a prima facie case. It considered the evidence against him was insufficient and incapable of establishing the elements of the offenses with which he had been accused. Pending the c…
EMD EMD 2026-09-01 52683/22 Communicated case

JANEVA v. NORTH MACEDONIA

North Macedonia
The application concerns the alleged unfairness of criminal proceedings against the applicant, who is the former Special Public Prosecutor (for the background to the establishment of the Special Public Prosecutor’s Office, see Taleski v. North Macedonia (dec.), no. 77796/17 and five other applications, §§ 4-10, 24 January 2023).
EMD EMD 2026-09-01 11892/25, 12032/25 Communicated case

IOANNOU v. CYPRUS and 1 other application

Cyprus
The applicants are police officers against whom criminal and disciplinary proceedings were initiated in 2009 for, inter alia, corruption. In the meantime, the applicants were suspended from office, placed in detention for five days, and received reduced salaries. According to the applicants, the decision to institute criminal proceedings against the applicants was taken by the Deputy Attorney General at the time, not…
EMD EMD – Chamber 2026-09-01 51829/21 Judgment

CASE OF D.T. v. GREECE

Greece
Violation of Article 3 - Prohibition of torture (Article 3 - Degrading treatment; Inhuman treatment) (Substantive aspect); No violation of Article 13+3 - Right to an effective remedy (Article 13 - Effective remedy) (Article 3 - Prohibition of torture; Degrading treatment; Inhuman treatment); Non-pecuniary damage - award (Article 41 - Non-pecuniary damage; Just satisfaction)
EMD EMD – Chamber 2026-09-01 25336/22 Judgment

CASE OF MANKUS v. LITHUANIA

Lithuania
Struck out of the list (Art. 37) Striking out applications-{general}; (Art. 37-1) Striking out applications; (Art. 37-1) Respect for human rights; (Art. 37-1-a) Absence of intention to pursue application; Violation of Article 8 - Right to respect for private and family life (Article 8-1 - Respect for private life); Pecuniary and non-pecuniary damage - award (Article 41 - Non-pecuniary damage; Pecuniary damage; Just s…
DDB Retten i Viborg 2026-08-31 SS-465/2026-VIB Dom

Tiltale for overtrædelse af straffelovens § 237 og § 277 for drab og forsøg på røveri og færdselslovens § 117

Anklagemyndigheden
Dom i sag om drab og forsøg på røveri Dom afsagt: 31. august 2026 Retten i Viborg har i dag afsagt dom i en nævningesag, hvor en nu 31-årig kvinde er fundet skyldig i drab. Sagsnummer 465/2026 Sagen kort fortalt Kvinden var tiltalt for den 30. december 2024 at have dræbt en anden kvinde med knivstik samt for forsøg på røveri mod kvinden. Hun var endvidere tiltalt for overtrædelse af straffelovens § 249, brugstyver…
DDB Retten i Helsingør 2026-08-31 BS-1038/2025-HEL Dom

Sagen drejer sig om injurierende og falske beskyldninger om strafbare handlinger

Medlem dømt for grooming- beskyldning Retten i Helsingør har den 31. august 2026 dømt et Medlem for uberettiget at have beskyldt en lærerkollega for grooming. Sagsnummer: [BS-1038/2025-HEL] Medlem dømt for grooming-beskyldning Retten i Helsingør har den 31. august 2026 dømt et Medlem for uberettiget at have beskyldt en lærerkollega for grooming. Sagsnummer: [BS-1038/2025-HEL] Sagen kort fortalt Medlem og hendes…
DDB Københavns Byret 2026-08-31 BS-1182/2025-KBH Dom

Sag om førtidspension og opgørelse af bopælstid ved ophold i udlandet som beskæftiget i offentlig dansk interesse, jf. pensionslovens §6

Ankestyrelsen
Sag om størrelsen af pension til en person med mulig tilknytning til PET Dom afsagt: 31. august 2026 Dom afsagt: 31. august 2026 Sagen handlede bl.a. om Sagsøger har bevist, at han, mens han var i udlandet fra 2008 - 2012, i dansk interesse samarbejdede med PET, så perioden skal medregnes til bopælstiden i Danmark ved beregnin-gen af førtidspension. Ved dommen får Sagsøger medhold i, at der i den omhandlede periode…
EMD EMD 2026-08-31 60609/21 Communicated case

VARDANYAN v. ARMENIA

Armenia
The application concerns libel proceedings brought against the applicant – a lawyer specialised in environmental law – by a private company (“the company”) which developed the Amulsar gold mine project. As a member of a working group on responsible State mining policy (including the Amulsar mine project) the applicant participated in a meeting of the working group, during which she insinuated that the company had eng…
EMD EMD 2026-08-31 41089/20 Communicated case

GASPARYAN v. ARMENIA

Armenia
On 1 January 2017 the applicant started working in a water supply company (“the Company”) as a Deputy Head of a Technical Directorate. On 29 March 2017 the Company notified the applicant that his employment contract in that position would be terminated, while offering him the position of the head of another division. The applicant marked “I agree” on that notice.
EMD EMD 2026-08-31 8639/26 Communicated case

LALOO AND BRAEM v. BELGIUM

Belgium
La requête concerne la durée de la procédure pénale menée contre les requérants qui débuta le 9 septembre 2015 et se termina avec l’arrêt de la Cour de cassation du 28 octobre 2025. La partie de la procédure devant cette juridiction dura du 3 décembre 2020 au 28 octobre 2025, soit environ quatre ans et dix mois.
HR Højesteret 2026-08-28 31/2026 Dom/kendelse

Domfældelse af T på grundlag af bevismateriale tilvejebragt ved brug af kontrolkøber var ikke i strid med artikel 6 i Menneskerettighedskonventionen

Anklagemyndigheden mod T
AI Dommen fra Højesteret i sagen om tobakssurrogat-sagen finder, at T er blevet straffet på et bevisgrundlag, der er blevet tilvejebragt ved provokation. Det er blevet konstateret, at Sikkerhedsstyrelsen havde instrueret en 16-årig kontrolkøber om at købe tobakssurrogat i T's butik, selv om produktet ikke måtte sælges til personer under 18 år. Højesteret finder, at dette ikke kan anses for en passiv efterforskning, og a…
DDB Retten i Glostrup 2026-08-28 SS-9052/2025-GLO Dom

Tiltale for forsøg på manddrab efter straffelovens § 237, jf. § 21. Påstand om godtgørelse

Anklagemyndigheden
35-årig dømt for drabsforsøg ved flere knivstik på en 37-årig mand. Dom afsagt: 28. august 2026 Den 3. september 2025 blev en nu 37-årig mand stukket flere gange med kniv i sin lejlighed i By 1. Den tiltalte 35-årige mand har ikke villet udtale sig under retssagen men har i tidligere udtalelser erkendt, at han var til stede i lejligheden. Sagsnummer: S17-9052/2025 Sagen kort fortalt En 37-årig mand bankede om aft…
DDB Højesteret 2026-08-28 SS-31/2026-HJR Dom

Højesteret stadfæster Landsrettens afgørelse i sag om tiltale for overtrædelse af lovbekendtgørelse nr. 1088 af 10. oktober 2024 om forbud mod salg af tobak og alkohol til personer under 18 år (dagældende lovbekendtgørelse nr. 583 af 26. marts 2021) § 5, stk. 1, jf. § 1, stk. 1, jf. § 2a, stk. 1

AI **Sag 31/2026** 1. **Fakta**: En kontrolkøber, der var 16 år gammel, købte tobakssurrogat i en butik uden at vise gyldig legitimationspapir. Butiksejeren blev anmeldt for at have solgt tobak til en person under 18 år, og blev dømt til en bøde på 25.000 kr. 2. **Retssag**: Tiltaltes advokater argumenterede, at domfældelsen var i strid med artikel 6 i Menneskerettighedskonventionen om retfærdig rettergang, fordi bevi…
DDB Østre Landsret 2026-08-28 BS-55849/2024-OLR Dom

Sag om, hvorvidt sagsøgtes afgørelse, der bl.a. pålagde sagsøger S/I (Skole), at tilbagebetale 27. mio. kr. af tidligere modtaget statstilskud, skal tilsidesættes helt eller delvist som ugyldig

Styrelsen for Undervisning og Kvalitet (STUK)
Dom i sag mellem Sagsøger S/I (Skole) og STUK Dom afsagt: 28. august 2026 Sagen angik prøvelse af Styrelsen for Undervisning og Kvalitets afgørelse af 2. maj 2023, der blandt andet pålagde Sagsøger S/I (Skole) at tilbagebetale 27 mio. kr. af tidligere modtaget statstilskud. Spørgsmålet var, om afgørelsen skulle tilsidesættes helt eller delvist som ugyldig. Sagsøger S/I (Skole) var af den opfattelse, at afgørelsen …
DDB Københavns Byret 2026-08-28 BS-3882/2024-KBH Dom

Sag om skattemæssig og momsmæssig kvalifikation af konsulentvederlag via bureau - lønmodtager kontra selvstændig erhvervsvirksomhed

Skatteministeriet
DOMSRESUMÉ – CIVIL KØBENHAVNS BYRET - DOMHUSET NYTORV 25 - 1450 KØBENHAVN K - TELEFON 99 68 70 00 28. august 2026 Dom i sag om beskatning af ekstern konsulents indkomst. Københavns Byret har den 28. august 2026 afsagt dom om, at en ekstern konsulents ind ­ komstikke var lønmodtagerindkomst, men indkomst oppebåret ved selvstændig er ­ hvervsvirksomhed, og at konsulentvirksomheden var en afgiftspligtig person efter…
HR Højesteret 2026-08-27 13035/2026 Dom/kendelse

Det ville være i strid med retten til en retfærdig rettergang at afvise en medarbejders sag mod en international organisation

OSCE Parliamentary Assembly mod A
AI Højesteret har afgjort sagen om A's krav mod OSCE Parliamentary Assembly (OSCE PA) om godtgørelse for ophævelsen af hendes kontrakt uden varsel. Højesteret har konkluderet, at OSCE PA's immunitet ikke kan gøres gældende i denne sag, da det ville udgøre en krænkelse af A's ret til en retfærdig rettergang efter Den Europæiske Menneskerettighedskonventions artikel 6. Højesteret har fundet, at den interne tvisteløsnings…
EMD EMD 2026-08-27 9867/26 Communicated case

VUJANOVIĆ v. MONTENEGRO

Montenegro
The applicant, a former judge of the Supreme Court, sought damages from the State for length of administrative proceedings concerning her judicial office, and claimed 5,000 euros (EUR) in just satisfaction. Although the competent court found a violation, it awarded the applicant EUR 500. The Constitutional Court dismissed her constitutional complaint by a decision of 4 January 2026.
EMD EMD 2026-08-27 37793/25 Communicated case

GUMUS v. SERBIA

Serbia
The application concerns the confiscation of undeclared cash belonging to the applicant at a border crossing. On 19 August 2019, while entering Serbia on his way to Türkiye, the applicant, a Turkish national, was stopped by Serbian customs officers who discovered that he was carrying 282,550 euros in cash, which he failed to declare, “in breach of the relevant legal obligation to declare all sums exceeding 10,000 eur…
EMD EMD – Committee 2026-08-27 5195/17 Judgment

CASE OF GHUKASYAN v. ARMENIA

Armenia
Violation of Article 5 - Right to liberty and security (Article 5-1 - Lawful arrest or detention); Violation of Article 5 - Right to liberty and security (Article 5-4 - Speediness of review); Violation of Article 5 - Right to liberty and security (Article 5-3 - Length of pre-trial detention)
EMD EMD – Committee 2026-08-27 41386/17, 35666/18, 22888/19, 58121/19, 29347/20, 40677/20, 40815/20, 50588/20 Judgment

CASE OF MACİT AND OTHERS v. TÜRKİYE

Türkiye
Violation of Article 5 - Right to liberty and security (Article 5-3 - Length of pre-trial detention); Violation of Article 5 - Right to liberty and security (Article 5-4 - Procedural guarantees of review); Violation of Article 5 - Right to liberty and security (Article 5-4 - Speediness of review)
EMD EMD – Committee 2026-08-27 19489/25, 27348/25, 28828/25 Judgment

CASE OF SHYTIKOV AND OTHERS v. UKRAINE

Ukraine
Violation of Article 6 - Right to a fair trial (Article 6 - Civil proceedings; Article 6-1 - Reasonable time); Violation of Article 13+6-1 - Right to an effective remedy (Article 13 - Effective remedy) (Article 6 - Right to a fair trial; Civil proceedings; Article 6-1 - Reasonable time)
EMD EMD – Committee 2026-08-27 31399/23 Judgment

CASE OF PRONTO INTERVENTI SIDA DI BUTERA FRANCESCO v. ITALY

Italy
Violation of Article 6 - Right to a fair trial (Article 6 - Enforcement proceedings; Article 6-1 - Access to court); Violation of Article 1 of Protocol No. 1 - Protection of property (Article 1 para. 1 of Protocol No. 1 - Peaceful enjoyment of possessions); Violation of Article 6 - Right to a fair trial (Article 6 - Enforcement proceedings; Article 6-1 - Access to court)
EMD EMD – Committee 2026-08-27 19195/23, 21299/24 Judgment

CASE OF ANGYAL AND OTHERS v. SLOVAKIA

Slovakia
Violation of Article 6 - Right to a fair trial (Article 6 - Administrative proceedings; Article 6-1 - Reasonable time); Violation of Article 13+6-1 - Right to an effective remedy (Article 13 - Effective remedy) (Article 6 - Right to a fair trial; Administrative proceedings; Article 6-1 - Reasonable time)
EMD EMD 2026-08-26 22006/24 Communicated case

RORY v. ROMANIA

Romania
The application concerns the respondent State’ responsibility for the inhuman treatment allegedly suffered by the applicant while placed in State orphanages during the communist era and the effectiveness of the legal framework available to obtain acknowledgment and redress for the resulting physical and psychological suffering. In particular, it raises the question whether the applicant was denied such redress as a r…
EMD EMD 2026-08-26 3413/24, 3625/24, 3867/24 Communicated case

CIJNTJE v. THE NETHERLANDS and 2 other applications

Netherlands
The applications concern the right to legal representation by a lawyer of one’s own choosing in criminal proceedings. On 25 February 2020 the applicants were convicted by the Court of First Instance in Curaçao of accepting bribes in connection with a tender process conducted by their employer, a State-owned company. The criminal investigation had been initiated following a report filed by the Prime Minister of Curaça…
EMD EMD 2026-08-26 14586/26 Communicated case

G.S. AND FUNDAŢIA CENTRUL DE RESURSE JURIDICE v. ROMANIA

Romania
The application mainly concerns the allegations of deprivation of liberty in the publicly run Medical and Social Care Centre where the first applicant was placed. It also concerns alleged breach of her right to private life, as she does not have a legal guardian appointed by the authorities despite her severe mental and physical disability.
EMD EMD 2026-08-25 12106/20 Communicated case

SHEVCHENKO v. UKRAINE

Ukraine
The case concerns the applicant’s allegedly arbitrary and disproportionate eviction, on 10 January 2020, from a State-owned residential bloc of apartments, where she had been accommodated, together with her disabled son (born in 1997), since 1 January 2006. The applicant complains under Article 8 of the Convention that her eviction interfered with her right to respect for her home. She additionally relies on Article …
EMD EMD – Chamber 2026-08-25 30915/23 Judgment

CASE OF ALEKSIEVA AND OTHERS v. BULGARIA

Bulgaria
Preliminary objection joined to merits and dismissed (Art. 34) Individual applications; (Art. 34) Victim; Remainder inadmissible (Art. 35) Admissibility criteria; (Art. 35-1) Exhaustion of domestic remedies; (Art. 35-3-a) Manifestly ill-founded; (Art. 35-3-a) Ratione materiae; Violation of Article 8 - Right to respect for private and family life (Article 8-1 - Respect for home); Respondent State to take measures of a…
EMD EMD – Grand Chamber 2026-08-25 2170/24 Judgment

CASE OF KAVALA v. TÜRKİYE (No. 2)

Türkiye
Preliminary objection dismissed (Art. 35) Admissibility criteria; (Art. 35-1) Exhaustion of domestic remedies; Remainder inadmissible (Art. 35) Admissibility criteria; (Art. 35-1) Exhaustion of domestic remedies; Violation of Article 10 - Freedom of expression - {general} (Article 10-1 - Freedom of expression); Violation of Article 11 - Freedom of assembly and association (Article 11-1 - Freedom of peaceful assembly)…
EMD EMD 2026-08-25 2170/24 Legal summary

Kavala v. Türkiye (No. 2) [GC]

Türkiye
Preliminary objection dismissed (Art. 35) Admissibility criteria; (Art. 35-1) Exhaustion of domestic remedies; Remainder inadmissible (Art. 35) Admissibility criteria; (Art. 35-1) Exhaustion of domestic remedies; Violation of Article 10 - Freedom of expression - {general} (Article 10-1 - Freedom of expression); Violation of Article 11 - Freedom of assembly and association (Article 11-1 - Freedom of peaceful assembly)…
HR Højesteret 2026-08-24 44501/2025 Dom/kendelse

Godtgørelse som følge af uberettiget videregivelse af oplysninger i forbindelse med aktindsigt

A og B mod Hillerød Kommune Biintervenient til støtte for Hillerød Kommune: KL
AI Højesteret har i en dom fastslået, at Hillerød Kommune har krænket A's ret til privatliv efter Menneskerettighedskonventionens artikel 8 ved at videregive oplysninger om hendes helbred til en privatperson. Kommunen har også krænket B's ret til privatliv ved at videregive oplysninger om hans privatøkonomiske situation. Højesteret har bestemt, at Hillerød Kommune skal betale en godtgørelse på 30.000 kr. til A med proc…
EMD EMD 2026-08-24 1373/26 Communicated case

DEGNER v. GERMANY

Germany
The application concerns the failure of the Oldenburg Court of Appeal to provide reasons for its decision not to refer the matter to the Court of Justice of the European Union (CJEU) for a preliminary ruling notwithstanding the applicant’s request in this respect.
EMD EMD 2026-08-24 38616/25 Communicated case

TIALINI GMBH & CO. KG v. GERMANY

Germany
The application concerns the failure of the Federal Court of Justice to provide reasons for its decision not to refer the matter to the Court of Justice of the European Union (CJEU) for a preliminary ruling notwithstanding the applicant company’s request in this respect.
EMD EMD 2026-08-24 33164/20 Communicated case

RYMSHA v. UKRAINE

Ukraine
The applicant bought a flat from a private party. Domestic courts later found that the flat had been alienated from a previous owner through a fictitious transaction and ordered its return to the previous owner’s alleged heir. The applicant considers that the courts’ findings and the order requiring the return of the flat breached his rights under Article 6 of the Convention and Article 1 of Protocol No. 1.
EMD EMD 2026-08-24 28299/25 Communicated case

Z v. SPAIN

Spain
The applicant was the victim of a sexual assault in Pamplona in July 2016. Her attackers were convicted for rape and sentenced to fifteen years of imprisonment. The case attracted great media and public attention in Spain and became known as the Manada case. The Manada was the name of a WhatsApp group used by the convicted to communicate among themselves.
EMD EMD 2026-08-24 2899/26 Communicated case

MARJANOVIĆ SLAVKOVIĆ v. SERBIA

Serbia
The application concerns the reasonableness and duration of the applicant’s pre-trial detention. By an order of the Novi Sad High Court of 23 November 2024, the applicant was placed in detention on remand. Her detention was subsequently extended on several occasions and remained in force until 17 June 2025, when it was replaced by house arrest. Between 20 December 2024 and 20 June 2025, the applicant lodged seven con…
HR Højesteret 2026-08-21 36329/2025 Dom/kendelse

Ikke krav på godtgørelse for bl.a. forsinket erhvervelse af dansk indfødsret

Part 1, Part 2, Part 4, Part 5, Part 6, Part 7, Part 8, Part 9, Part 10, Part 11, Part 12, Part 13, Part 14, Part 15, Part 16, Part 17, Part 18, Part 19, Part 21, Part 22, Part 24 og Part 25 mod Udlæn
AI Højesteret har behandlet en sag om godtgørelse og erstatning til følgende personer, der har søgt dansk indfødsret: * Part 1 * Part 2 * Part 8 * Part 25 * Part 4 * Part 5 * Part 6 * Part 7 * Part 12 * Part 13 * Part 21 * Part 22 * Part 24 * Part 9 * Part 10 * Part 11 * Part 14 * Part 15 * Part 16 * Part 17 * Part 18 * Part 19 Højesteret har vurderet, om disse personer har krav på godtgørelse og erstatning på grund a…
DDB Højesteret 2026-08-21 BS-36329/2025-HJR Dom

Højesteret stadfæster Landsrettens afgørelse i sag om, hvorvidt appellanterne, der har været statsløse, har krav på godtgørelse og erstatning for følger af forsinket erhvervelse af dansk indfødsret

Udlændinge- og Integrationsministeriet
AI Højesterets dom i sagen om godtgørelse og erstatning for statsløse, der har været udsat for forsinket behandling af ansøgninger om dansk indfødsret, og for diskrimination og krænkelse af privatlivet ved indsamling og behandling af personoplysninger.
DDB Københavns Byret 2026-08-21 BS-63249/2024-KBH Dom

Sag om ophævelse af et boliglejemål

Sag om korttidsudlejning af lejligheder i København (”skyggehoteller”) Dom afsagt: 21. august 2026 Sagen handlede om, hvorvidt en udlejer var berettiget til at foretage ophævelse af i alt syv boliglejemål i København, som var lejet af et selskab mhp. videreudlejning til beboelse, med den begrundelse, at lejeren anvendte det lejede til ulovlig korttidsudlejning og i strid med lejeaftalerne. Sagen kort fortalt Sagsøg…
HR Højesteret 2026-08-20 99/2025 Dom/kendelse

En sagsbehandlingstid på knap 4 år frem til byrettens dom kunne ikke medføre, at frakendelsen af Ts førerret blev gjort betinget

Anklagemyndigheden mod T
AI **Dom i Højesteret, sagsnummer 99/2025** **Facts** T blev sigtet for at have kørt bil efter at have indtaget bevidsthedspåvirkende stoffer og selv om hun var frakendt førerretten. Sagen var blevet ført frem til Højesteret efter at have været behandlet i Københavns Byret og Østre Landsret. **Legal question** Spørgsmålet var, om frakendelsen af Ts førerret skulle bortfalde eller gøres betinget på grund af lang sags…